Safe

Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip

by Archer Farms

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0085239500705 · Archer Farms · Condiments. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0085239500705 · Serving size 2 Tbsp (30 g)

The verdict

Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip by Archer Farms scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 41 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. The source parser split this into a very long 41-component record, beginning with Cooked Chicken, Chicken, Chicken Broth. That density can include amounts and label fragments, so verify the physical label before relying on ingredient order or completeness. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 41 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
E
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

58/100

Grade C

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

E

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

39500705 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-DENSE 41 ing. REG-SPARSE 15% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-E Nutri-E RANK-SHORT Len top 1% LEAD-RARE Natamycin PHOTO-FINISH Roasted garlic hummus · ±0 BOOK-OFF …500705 · July 2026

6 of 41 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Natamycin). Source sheet 39500705 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Roasted garlic hummus · Nearest score peer is Roasted garlic hummus at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

Nutri-Score assigned its lowest band to this label. The algorithm reserves that grade for nutrition panels where the values it penalises sit well above the components it credits. The two systems on this page measure genuinely different things: a product can hold this grade while carrying no additive flagged by the registries screened below, and a product graded well can carry several. Neither reading substitutes for the other, and the per-component table is where the additive picture is set out.

The declared list is among the longer ones in this catalogue. A component set this wide means the screen returns many individual ratings, and the composite accumulates a large number of small contributions instead of turning on a handful of entries. At this length the per-component table below is substantially more informative than the single figure, because the figure compresses a great deal of variation into one number.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip100/1002. Roasted garlic hummus: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Roasted garlic hummus100/1003. Tomato Basil Hummus: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Tomato Basil Hummus100/1004. Simply balanced, organic hummus, lemon cilantro: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Simply balanced, organic …100/1005. Crispy chicken strips fully cooked crispy chicken breast strip fritters with rib meat: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Crispy chicken strips ful…100/100
High-band neighbours for Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip (100/100) outside Archer Farms.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip
100/100
Roasted garlic hummus
100/100
Tomato Basil Hummus
100/100
Simply balanced, organic hummus, lemon cilantro
100/100
Crispy chicken strips fully cooked crispy chicken breast strip fritters with rib meat
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 31,268 products we've scored in the Condiments category, the average safety score is 98.3/100. Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip scores 1.7 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 98.3/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Condiments products

Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip lists 41 ingredients on its label

41 99th percentile a longer ingredient list than 99% of the 27,084 products we track

0–2: 186 products (1%). Below this entry. 2–4: 1,031 products (4%). Below this entry. 4–6: 1,392 products (5%). Below this entry. 6–8: 2,093 products (8%). Below this entry. 8–10: 2,811 products (10%). Below this entry. 10–12: 3,070 products (11%). Below this entry. 12–14: 2,818 products (10%). Below this entry. 14–16: 2,724 products (10%). Below this entry. 16–18: 2,451 products (9%). Below this entry. 18–20: 2,045 products (8%). Below this entry. 20–22: 1,563 products (6%). Below this entry. 22–24: 1,244 products (5%). Below this entry. 24–26: 934 products (3%). Below this entry. 26–28: 694 products (3%). Below this entry. 28–30: 551 products (2%). Below this entry. 30–32: 420 products (2%). Below this entry. 32–34: 246 products (1%). Below this entry. 34–36: 196 products (1%). Below this entry. 36–38: 135 products (0%). Below this entry. 38–40: 134 products (0%). Below this entry. 40–42: 346 products (1%). This entry sits in this band. This product 0 42 every published Condiments product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

27,084 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 41 (99th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
186 products (1%)
2–4
1,031 products (4%)
4–6
1,392 products (5%)
6–8
2,093 products (8%)
8–10
2,811 products (10%)
10–12
3,070 products (11%)
12–14
2,818 products (10%)
14–16
2,724 products (10%)
16–18
2,451 products (9%)
18–20
2,045 products (8%)
20–22
1,563 products (6%)
22–24
1,244 products (5%)
24–26
934 products (3%)
26–28
694 products (3%)
28–30
551 products (2%)
30–32
420 products (2%)
32–34
246 products (1%)
34–36
196 products (1%)
36–38
135 products (0%)
38–40
134 products (0%)
40 and above
346 products (1%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 27,084 Condiments products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Cooked chicken (chicken, chicken broth, water, salt, sodium phosphates, natural flavor), neufchatel cheese (pasteurized milk & cream, skim milk, cheese culture, salt, stabilizers [carob bean gum and/or xanthan and/or guar gum and/or locust bean gums]), hot sauce (aged cayenne red peppers, vinegar, water, salt, and garlic powder), blue cheese dressing (soybean oil, blue cheese [pasteurized milk, cheese culture, salt, enzymes, natamycin (a preservative)], water, egg yolk, high fructose corn syrup, distilled vinegar, cider vinegar, corn sugar vinegar, sugar, xanthan gum, natural and artificial flavors, lactic acid, enzyme modified butterfat, modified corn starch), celery, red pepper, potassium sorbate and sodium benzoate (to preserve freshness).

Categories

Condiments Sauces Dips Groceries

High-score cross-brand comparables for Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip

Neighbours outside Archer Farms with screening scores in the same high band as Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Archer Farms; these peers cross brands.

Read the longer label in layers

Read the longer label in layers

Buffalo-Style Chicken Dip has a longer ingredient list than 99% of its Condiments category comparison set. Use the ingredient table before relying on its single screening score.

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0085239500705: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.