Safe

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut

by Clif Bar And Company

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0722252165282 · Clif Bar And Company · Snacks. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0722252165282 · Serving size 1 BAR (68 g)

The verdict

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut by Clif Bar And Company scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 40 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. The source parser split this into a very long 40-component record, beginning with Brown Rice Syrup, Organic Rolled Oats, Soy Protein Isolate. That density can include amounts and label fragments, so verify the physical label before relying on ingredient order or completeness. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 40 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
D
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

63/100

Grade C+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

D

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

52165282 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-DENSE 40 ing. REG-SPARSE 20% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-D Nutri-D RANK-SHORT Len top 10% LEAD-RARE Magnesium Oxide PHOTO-FINISH Coconut chocolate chip · ±0 BOOK-OFF …165282 · July 2026

8 of 40 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Magnesium Oxide). Source sheet 52165282 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Coconut chocolate chip energy bars · Nearest score peer is Coconut chocolate chip energy bars at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

This label falls in the fourth Nutri-Score band. The model arrives there when its penalty terms — energy density, sugars, saturated fat, sodium — carry more weight in the calculation than the fibre, protein and produce content it credits. The band covers a wide span of the points scale, so position within it is not visible from the letter alone. The grade reflects the declared nutrition panel and is unrelated to the additive ratings listed below, which come from different bodies applying different criteria.

The declared list is among the longer ones in this catalogue. A component set this wide means the screen returns many individual ratings, and the composite accumulates a large number of small contributions instead of turning on a handful of entries. At this length the per-component table below is substantially more informative than the single figure, because the figure compresses a great deal of variation into one number.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. White chocolate macadamia…100/1002. Coconut chocolate chip energy bars: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Coconut chocolate chip en…100/1003. Chocolate chip energy bars, chocolate chip: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Chocolate chip energy bar…100/1004. Crunchy peanut butter energy bars, crunchy peanut butter: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Crunchy peanut butter ene…100/1005. Chocolate chip energy bars, chocolate chip: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Chocolate chip energy bar…100/100
High-band neighbours for White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut (100/100) outside Clif Bar And Company.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut
100/100
Coconut chocolate chip energy bars
100/100
Chocolate chip energy bars, chocolate chip
100/100
Crunchy peanut butter energy bars, crunchy peanut butter
100/100
Chocolate chip energy bars, chocolate chip
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 88,006 products we've scored in the Snacks category, the average safety score is 86.1/100. White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut scores 13.9 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 86.1/100), so it is a comparatively strong pick for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Snacks products

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut lists 40 ingredients on its label

40 90th percentile a longer ingredient list than 90% of the 81,477 products we track

0–2: 275 products (0%). Below this entry. 2–4: 2,901 products (4%). Below this entry. 4–6: 4,248 products (5%). Below this entry. 6–8: 5,408 products (7%). Below this entry. 8–10: 5,486 products (7%). Below this entry. 10–12: 5,840 products (7%). Below this entry. 12–14: 6,252 products (8%). Below this entry. 14–16: 6,724 products (8%). Below this entry. 16–18: 6,221 products (8%). Below this entry. 18–20: 5,168 products (6%). Below this entry. 20–22: 4,508 products (6%). Below this entry. 22–24: 3,809 products (5%). Below this entry. 24–26: 3,567 products (4%). Below this entry. 26–28: 2,829 products (3%). Below this entry. 28–30: 2,282 products (3%). Below this entry. 30–32: 1,905 products (2%). Below this entry. 32–34: 1,715 products (2%). Below this entry. 34–36: 1,572 products (2%). Below this entry. 36–38: 1,417 products (2%). Below this entry. 38–40: 1,284 products (2%). Below this entry. 40–42: 8,066 products (10%). This entry sits in this band. This product 0 42 every published Snacks product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

81,477 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 40 (90th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
275 products (0%)
2–4
2,901 products (4%)
4–6
4,248 products (5%)
6–8
5,408 products (7%)
8–10
5,486 products (7%)
10–12
5,840 products (7%)
12–14
6,252 products (8%)
14–16
6,724 products (8%)
16–18
6,221 products (8%)
18–20
5,168 products (6%)
20–22
4,508 products (6%)
22–24
3,809 products (5%)
24–26
3,567 products (4%)
26–28
2,829 products (3%)
28–30
2,282 products (3%)
30–32
1,905 products (2%)
32–34
1,715 products (2%)
34–36
1,572 products (2%)
36–38
1,417 products (2%)
38–40
1,284 products (2%)
40 and above
8,066 products (10%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 81,477 Snacks products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Organic brown rice syrup, organic rolled oats, soy protein isolate, organic cane syrup, organic roasted soybeans, rice flour, macadamia nuts, organic dried cane syrup, organic oat fiber, organic soy flour, cocoa butter++, organic high oleic sunflower oil, natural flavors, organic cocoa butter++, sea salt, soy flour, barley malt extract, soy lecithin, mixed tocopherols (antioxidant). vitamins & minerals: dicalcium phosphate, magnesium oxide, ascorbic acid (vit. c), dl-alpha tocopheryl acetate (vit. e), beta carotene (vit. a), niacinamide (vit. b3), ergocalciferol (vit. d2), thiamine mononitrate (vit. b1), pyridoxine hydrochloride (vit. b6), riboflavin (vit. b2), cyanocobalamin (vit. b12).

Categories

Snacks

High-score cross-brand comparables for White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut

Neighbours outside Clif Bar And Company with screening scores in the same high band as White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Clif Bar And Company; these peers cross brands.

Read the longer label in layers

Read the longer label in layers

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars, white chocolate macadamia nut has a longer ingredient list than 90% of its Snacks category comparison set. Use the ingredient table before relying on its single screening score.

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0722252165282: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.