White meat chicken salad

100
Safe
Safety Score (out of 100)

White meat chicken salad receives a safety score of 100/100 based on ingredient analysis using FDA Substances Added to Food (SAFFA) data and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. None of the ingredients in this product are flagged for safety concerns by FDA or CSPI databases. Product label data is sourced from the OpenFoodFacts collaborative database. See the full ingredient breakdown and safety assessment below.

Barcode
0041735023193
Nutri-Score
d
NOVA Group
4 — Ultra-processed
Serving Size
1/2 cup (116 g)

What the Data Says About

White meat chicken salad carries a composite safety score of 100/100, which we classify as "Safe" on our four-tier shelf-label framework. The score is computed by mapping each labeled ingredient against FDA Substances Added to Food (SAFFA) regulatory status and CSPI Chemical Cuisine classifications, then penalizing the overall product for each additive rated as caution-or-worse. Product data originates from the OpenFoodFacts collaborative catalog; safety annotations come from federal regulators and the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Our scan did not identify any ingredients in this product that FDA SAFFA or CSPI Chemical Cuisine data flags as requiring caution or avoidance at the time of analysis. That is a meaningful clean-label signal, though it does not account for personal allergens, regional recalls, or inspection findings not reflected in federal additive databases. The per-ingredient breakdown below shows the source-level classification for each component.

On the NOVA processing scale, White meat chicken salad is classified as Group 4 (Ultra-processed). NOVA measures industrial processing intensity rather than ingredient-level safety, so it complements the SAFFA and CSPI ratings: a product can be clean on additive flags but heavily processed, or lightly processed but carry individually flagged ingredients. Combining both lenses gives a fuller picture than either alone. The Nutri-Score grade of D reflects nutritional balance — calories, saturated fat, sugar, sodium versus fiber, protein, and produce content — which again is a distinct dimension from additive safety and worth weighing alongside the scores above.

Safety Profile at a Glance

Composite safety metrics for White meat chicken salad
Metric Value Source
PlainFoodSafe Score 100/100 FDA SAFFA + CSPI composite
Flagged ingredients 0 CSPI/FDA review
NOVA processing group Group 4 OpenFoodFacts
Nutri-Score D OpenFoodFacts

Composite metric derived from FDA SAFFA, CSPI Chemical Cuisine, OpenFoodFacts. See methodology.

Ingredient Safety Analysis

1
White Chicken Meat
2
Mayonnaise
3
Soybean Oil
4
Distilled Vinegar
5
Water
6
Egg Yolk
7
Whole Egg
8
Salt
Flavoring
Cut Back
9
Sugar
Sweetener
Cut Back
10
Lemon Juice Concentrate
11
Natural Flavor
12
Oleoresin Paprika
13
For Color
14
Calcium Disodium Edta To Protect Flavor
15
White Chicken Pieces
16
White Chicken
17
Modified Food Starch
18
Sodium Phosphates
19
Celery
20
Salad Dressing
21
Corn Starch
22
Egg Yolks
23
Mustard
24
Mustard Seed
25
Spices
26
Torula yeast
Flavoring
Safe
27
Paprika
28
Natural Flavors
29
Xanthan Gum
ANTICAKING AGENT OR FREE-FLOW AGENT, COLOR OR COLORING ADJUNCT, DRYING AGENT, EMULSIFIER OR EMULSIFIER SALT, FORMULATION AID, PROCESSING AID, SOLVENT OR VEHICLE, STABILIZER OR THICKENER, SURFACE-FINISHING AGENT, TEXTURIZER
Approved
30
Potassium Sorbate
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT, ANTIOXIDANT, COLOR OR COLORING ADJUNCT, FLAVOR ENHANCER, FLAVORING AGENT OR ADJUVANT, NUTRIENT SUPPLEMENT, PH CONTROL AGENT
Safe GRAS
31
Preservative
32
Or Less Of Bread Crumbs
33
Unbleached Wheat Flour
34
Cane Sugar
35
Yeast
36
Sea salt
Flavoring
Cut Back
37
Seasoning
38
Maltodextrin
ANTICAKING AGENT OR FREE-FLOW AGENT, FLAVORING AGENT OR ADJUVANT, HUMECTANT, NUTRIENT SUPPLEMENT, NUTRITIVE SWEETENER, SOLVENT OR VEHICLE, STABILIZER OR THICKENER, SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENT, TEXTURIZER
Safe GRAS
39
Cultured Dextrose
40
Sodium Diacetate
FLAVORING AGENT OR ADJUVANT
Safe GRAS
41
Sodium Chloride
ANTICAKING AGENT OR FREE-FLOW AGENT, ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT, COLOR OR COLORING ADJUNCT, EMULSIFIER OR EMULSIFIER SALT, FIRMING AGENT, FLAVORING AGENT OR ADJUVANT, FORMULATION AID, NUTRIENT SUPPLEMENT, SOLVENT OR VEHICLE, STABILIZER OR THICKENER
GRAS
42
Egg White Lysozyme
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT, ENZYME
Listed
43
Nisin Preparation
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT
GRAS
44
Cider Vinegar
45
Cider And White
46
Citric Acid
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT, ANTIOXIDANT, ENZYME, FLAVOR ENHANCER, FLAVORING AGENT OR ADJUVANT, LEAVENING AGENT, PH CONTROL AGENT, SEQUESTRANT, SOLVENT OR VEHICLE, SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENT
Safe GRAS
47
Antioxidant
48
White Pepper

Full Ingredient List

White chicken meat, mayonnaise (soybean oil, distilled vinegar, water, egg yolk, whole egg, contains less than 2% of salt, sugar, lemon juice concentrate, natural flavor, oleoresin paprika [for color], calcium disodium edta to protect flavor), white chicken pieces (white chicken, water, salt, modified food starch, sodium phosphates), celery, salad dressing (water, soybean oil, sugar, distilled vinegar, modified corn starch, egg yolks, contains less than 2% mustard [distilled vinegar, water, mustard seed, salt], salt, spices, torula yeast, paprika [for color], natural flavors, xanthan gum, potassium sorbate [preservative]), contains 2% or less of bread crumbs (unbleached wheat flour, natural cane sugar, yeast, sea salt), seasoning (maltodextrin, cultured dextrose, sodium diacetate, salt, sodium chloride, egg white lysozyme, nisin preparation), salt, sugar, cider vinegar (cider and white), citric acid (antioxidant), white pepper.

Categories

Meals Prepared salads Salads

Data Sources

Data as of 2025. Source: OpenFoodFacts, FDA SAFFA, CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

Product data from OpenFoodFacts (ODbL). Ingredient safety ratings from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine. See our methodology for details.

This information is for reference only and does not constitute dietary or medical advice.

Related

Data sourced from official FDA, USDA, and CDC food-safety databases. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFoodSafe Editorial