Safe

Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham

by Jack Rabbit

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0070620001633 · Jack Rabbit · Meals. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0070620001633 · Serving size 0.25 cup (36 g)

The verdict

Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham by Jack Rabbit scores 90/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 32 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 2 ingredients are flagged for caution. The source parser split this into a very long 32-component record, beginning with Large Lima Beans, Organic Small White Beans, Red Kidney Beans. That density can include amounts and label fragments, so verify the physical label before relying on ingredient order or completeness. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

90/100
Safe safety score
2
Few flagged · of 32 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
A
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

73/100

Grade B

Ingredient Safety

90/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

A

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

20001633 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 90/100 FLAG-FEW 2 flagged LEN-DENSE 32 ing. REG-SPARSE 19% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-A Nutri-A RANK-MID Len top 44% LEAD-FLAG Polysorbate 80 PHOTO-FINISH Cookies 'N Cream · ±0 BOOK-OFF …001633 · July 2026

6 of 32 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Polysorbate 80). Source sheet 20001633 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Cookies 'N Cream Bar · Nearest score peer is Cookies 'N Cream Bar at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

Nutri-Score placed this label in its highest band. The model reaches that grade when the credit side of its ledger — fibre, protein and the fruit, vegetable and legume fraction — outweighs the energy, sugar, saturated-fat and sodium it counts against a product. The scale is computed per hundred grams from the declared nutrition panel, which is why two products with similar ingredients can grade differently on portion-heavy categories. It is a nutritional summary only, calculated independently of the additive registries screened further down this page, and it neither incorporates nor contradicts them.

This label parsed into a long component list. Where many entries are screened at once, the composite tends to reflect the overall mix of registry ratings returned rather than the rating of any one entry. Longer declarations also carry more sub-listed and compound entries, where a parenthetical group is resolved into its parts, so the parsed count can exceed what a reader counts on the packaging.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham: 90/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup…90/1002. Cookies 'N Cream Bar: 90/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Cookies 'N Cream Bar90/1003. Ice cream cones: 90/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Ice cream cones90/1004. Low fat ice cream, strawberry: 90/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Low fat ice cream, strawb…90/1005. Polar treats, ice cream, vanilla, vanilla: 90/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Polar treats, ice cream, …90/100
High-band neighbours for Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham (90/100) outside Jack Rabbit.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham
90/100
Cookies 'N Cream Bar
90/100
Ice cream cones
90/100
Low fat ice cream, strawberry
90/100
Polar treats, ice cream, vanilla, vanilla
90/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 15,626 products we've scored in the Meals category, the average safety score is 93.6/100. Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham scores 3.6 points below that category average (90/100 vs. 93.6/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Meals products

Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham lists 32 ingredients on its label

32 56th percentile a longer ingredient list than 56% of the 11,283 products we track

0–2: 12 products (0%). Below this entry. 2–4: 83 products (1%). Below this entry. 4–6: 127 products (1%). Below this entry. 6–8: 209 products (2%). Below this entry. 8–10: 312 products (3%). Below this entry. 10–12: 315 products (3%). Below this entry. 12–14: 412 products (4%). Below this entry. 14–16: 477 products (4%). Below this entry. 16–18: 542 products (5%). Below this entry. 18–20: 552 products (5%). Below this entry. 20–22: 545 products (5%). Below this entry. 22–24: 550 products (5%). Below this entry. 24–26: 552 products (5%). Below this entry. 26–28: 552 products (5%). Below this entry. 28–30: 574 products (5%). Below this entry. 30–32: 517 products (5%). Below this entry. 32–34: 466 products (4%). This entry sits in this band. 34–36: 451 products (4%). Above this entry. 36–38: 443 products (4%). Above this entry. 38–40: 388 products (3%). Above this entry. 40–42: 3,204 products (28%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Meals product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

11,283 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 32 (56th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
12 products (0%)
2–4
83 products (1%)
4–6
127 products (1%)
6–8
209 products (2%)
8–10
312 products (3%)
10–12
315 products (3%)
12–14
412 products (4%)
14–16
477 products (4%)
16–18
542 products (5%)
18–20
552 products (5%)
20–22
545 products (5%)
22–24
550 products (5%)
24–26
552 products (5%)
26–28
552 products (5%)
28–30
574 products (5%)
30–32
517 products (5%)
32–34
466 products (4%)
34–36
451 products (4%)
36–38
443 products (4%)
38–40
388 products (3%)
40 and above
3,204 products (28%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 11,283 Meals products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Ingredient Safety Analysis

How the 90/100 score is built

Screening starts at 100 and subtracts severity-weighted FDA SAFFA / CSPI flags (2 flagged of 32 labeled). The floor is 0 when deductions exceed 100.

Full Ingredient List

Contains 16 of the following varieties: large lima beans, small white beans, red kidney beans, baby lima beans, great northern beans, speckled lima beans, black beans, green baby lima beans, pinto beans, cranberry beans, pink beans, whole green peas, yellow split peas, lentils, green split peas, small red beans, navy beans, blackeye peas; seasoning (salt, hydrolyzed soy protein, maltodextrin. contains 2% or less of each of the following: autolyzed yeast extract, natural smoke flavor [smoke flavor, polysorbate 80], disodium inosinate and disodium guanylate, modified corn starch, vinegar solids, caramel color, natural smoke flavor, silicon dioxide [processing aid]).

Other products containing Green Baby Lima Beans

Green Baby Lima Beans is the least common ingredient on this label, appearing in 12 products across the catalog. See its safety profile.

Categories

Meals Soups

High-score cross-brand comparables for Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham

Neighbours outside Jack Rabbit with screening scores in the same high band as Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham (90/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Jack Rabbit; these peers cross brands.

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Polysorbate 80 is the first flagged ingredient selected from Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham's parsed label. Start with that ingredient’s source context, then compare the rest of this 32-ingredient record.

  • Inspect the FDA SAFFA and CSPI context attached to Polysorbate 80. Open Polysorbate 80
  • Compare Jack rabbit, 16 bean soup, ham's 2 flagged ingredients with a product from the same score neighbourhood. Compare labels
  • Check how caution flags contribute to the derived screening score before drawing a dietary conclusion. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0070620001633: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.