Caution

Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce

by Classic World Cuisine

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0748252644725 · Classic World Cuisine · Meats and their products. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0748252644725 · Serving size 4 ONZ (113 g)

The verdict

Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce by Classic World Cuisine scores 75/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 29 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 1 ingredient is flagged for caution. The 29-component label is layered, beginning with Boneless Pork, Chinese Style Red Rib Sauce, Sugar. Start with any flagged rows, then check the nutrition grade and serving size instead of treating one roll-up score as the whole decision. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

75/100
Caution safety score
1
One flagged · of 29 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
C
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

55/100

Grade C

Ingredient Safety

75/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

C

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

52644725 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce label screening desk

SCORE-CAUT 75/100 FLAG-ONE 1 flagged LEN-LAYERED 29 ing. REG-SPARSE 21% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-C Nutri-C RANK-SHORT Len top 6% LEAD-FLAG Red 3 PHOTO-FINISH Flix candy, jurassic · ±0 BOOK-OFF …644725 · July 2026

6 of 29 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Red 3). Source sheet 52644725 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Flix candy, jurassic world dinosaur gummies, orange, strawberry, green apple · Nearest score peer is Flix candy, jurassic world dinosaur gummies, orange, strawberry, green apple at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

The composite for this product falls in the second band of the four-tier framework. That band collects labels whose registry-rated components pull the derived score down measurably without dominating it. Position inside a band is not visible from the band name, and two labels sharing it can differ in how many components were rated and how severely. This is a threshold on an index computed here from public data, not a regulatory classification of any kind; the exact cut-offs are published on the methodology page.

Nutri-Score settled on its middle grade here, the band the algorithm produces when the penalty and credit sides of its nutrient ledger come out close to balanced. A mid-scale grade is a statement about the panel as a whole rather than about any single nutrient, and products arrive at it by very different routes: a moderate profile across every term, or high marks on some offset by heavy penalties on others. The grade is computed separately from the ingredient screen below and the two are not comparable measures.

This label parsed into a long component list. Where many entries are screened at once, the composite tends to reflect the overall mix of registry ratings returned rather than the rating of any one entry. Longer declarations also carry more sub-listed and compound entries, where a parenthetical group is resolved into its parts, so the parsed count can exceed what a reader counts on the packaging.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce: 75/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Pork Strips With Chinese …75/1002. Flix candy, jurassic world dinosaur gummies, orange, strawberry, green apple: 75/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Flix candy, jurassic worl…75/1003. Jurassic World Dinosaur Egg Hunt! Candies: 75/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Jurassic World Dinosaur E…75/1004. Justice League Valentine's Popping Candy: 75/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Justice League Valentine'…75/1005. Flix candy, justice league decorated lollipop rings, pineapple, strawberry, green apple: 75/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Flix candy, justice leagu…75/100
Nearest cross-brand screening scores for Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce (75/100 on 29 parsed ingredients).
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce
75/100
Flix candy, jurassic world dinosaur gummies, orange, strawberry, green apple
75/100
Jurassic World Dinosaur Egg Hunt! Candies
75/100
Justice League Valentine's Popping Candy
75/100
Flix candy, justice league decorated lollipop rings, pineapple, strawberry, green apple
75/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 13,350 products we've scored in the Meats and their products category, the average safety score is 92.4/100. Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce scores 17.4 points below that category average (75/100 vs. 92.4/100), so it is a comparatively weaker pick for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Meats and their products products

Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce lists 29 ingredients on its label

29 94th percentile a longer ingredient list than 94% of the 11,159 products we track

0–2: 79 products (1%). Below this entry. 2–4: 430 products (4%). Below this entry. 4–6: 612 products (5%). Below this entry. 6–8: 1,397 products (13%). Below this entry. 8–10: 1,485 products (13%). Below this entry. 10–12: 1,698 products (15%). Below this entry. 12–14: 1,463 products (13%). Below this entry. 14–16: 996 products (9%). Below this entry. 16–18: 734 products (7%). Below this entry. 18–20: 489 products (4%). Below this entry. 20–22: 377 products (3%). Below this entry. 22–24: 277 products (2%). Below this entry. 24–26: 234 products (2%). Below this entry. 26–28: 140 products (1%). Below this entry. 28–30: 145 products (1%). This entry sits in this band. 30–32: 92 products (1%). Above this entry. 32–34: 83 products (1%). Above this entry. 34–36: 66 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 74 products (1%). Above this entry. 38–40: 50 products (0%). Above this entry. 40–42: 238 products (2%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Meats and their products product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

11,159 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 29 (94th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
79 products (1%)
2–4
430 products (4%)
4–6
612 products (5%)
6–8
1,397 products (13%)
8–10
1,485 products (13%)
10–12
1,698 products (15%)
12–14
1,463 products (13%)
14–16
996 products (9%)
16–18
734 products (7%)
18–20
489 products (4%)
20–22
377 products (3%)
22–24
277 products (2%)
24–26
234 products (2%)
26–28
140 products (1%)
28–30
145 products (1%)
30–32
92 products (1%)
32–34
83 products (1%)
34–36
66 products (1%)
36–38
74 products (1%)
38–40
50 products (0%)
40 and above
238 products (2%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 11,159 Meats and their products products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Boneless pork, chinese style red rib sauce (sugar, cooking sherry [sherry wine, salt, potassium metabisulfite], salt, hoisen sauce [sugar, vinegar, soybean, water, salt, wheat flour, garlic, sesame seeds, chilli, spices, fd&c #40], ground bean sauce [water, soyabean, salt, wheat flour, sugar, sesame oil, spices], strawberry sauce [water, propylene glycol, fd&c red #3, red #40, yellow #6], granulated garlic, curry powder [natural spices, tumeric], spices)

Other products containing Ground Bean Sauce

Ground Bean Sauce is the least common ingredient on this label, appearing in 5 products across the catalog. See its safety profile.

Categories

Meats and their products Meats

Mid-score cross-brand comparables for Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce

Neighbours outside Classic World Cuisine near Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce's mid-band score (75/100). The 2 same-brand links above stay within Classic World Cuisine; these peers cross brands.

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Red 3 is the first flagged ingredient selected from Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce's parsed label. Start with that ingredient’s source context, then compare the rest of this 29-ingredient record.

  • Inspect the FDA SAFFA and CSPI context attached to Red 3. Open Red 3
  • Compare Pork Strips With Chinese Style Sauce's 1 flagged ingredients with a product from the same score neighbourhood. Compare labels
  • Check how caution flags contribute to the derived screening score before drawing a dietary conclusion. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0748252644725: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.