Safe

Organic, Infant Formula With Iron Milk-Based Powder

Name: Organic, Infant Formula With Iron Milk-Based Powder - Safety Analysis
Creator: PlainFoodSafe
License: https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/

by Earth's Best

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0023923100442 · Earth's Best. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Compiled by PlainFoodSafe · July 31, 2026

Barcode 0023923100442 · Serving size 658 g (23.2 oz)

The verdict

Organic, Infant Formula With Iron Milk-Based Powder by Earth's Best scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 54 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. The source parser split this into a very long 54-component record, beginning with Nonfat Milk, Lactose, Oils. That density can include amounts and label fragments, so verify the physical label before relying on ingredient order or completeness. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score: 0
None flagged · of 54 analyzed: Group 4
Ultra-processed: 0023923100442
Barcode (UPC/EAN)

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

70/100

Grade B

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

N/A

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

23100442 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Organic, Infant Formula With Iron Milk-Based Powder label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-DENSE 54 ing. REG-PART 44% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-UNK Nutri n/a RANK-SHORT Len top 2% LEAD-RARE Calcium Hydroxide PHOTO-FINISH Braising Base · ±0 BOOK-OFF …100442 · July 2026

24 of 54 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Calcium Hydroxide). Source sheet 23100442 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Braising Base · Nearest score peer is Braising Base at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

No Nutri-Score grade is present for this record in the OpenFoodFacts snapshot this page is built from. The nutritional dimension is absent rather than assessed and withheld: the grade depends on a complete declared nutrition panel, and community-contributed records vary in how much of that panel they carry. Nothing about the missing grade implies anything either way about the panel itself. The screen below covers additive ratings only and does not depend on the nutrition figures.

The declared list is among the longer ones in this catalogue. A component set this wide means the screen returns many individual ratings, and the composite accumulates a large number of small contributions instead of turning on a handful of entries. At this length the per-component table below is substantially more informative than the single figure, because the figure compresses a great deal of variation into one number.

High-band neighbours for Organic, Infant Formula With Iron Milk-Based Powder (100/100) outside Earth's Best.

Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Organic, Infant Formula With Iron Milk-Based Powder: 100/100
Braising Base: 100/100
Ultra Zinc+: 100/100
Finest Yoghurt, Blood Orange: 100/100
tart cherry finest yoghurt: 100/100

Ingredient-list length vs every product we publish

Organic, Infant Formula With Iron Milk-Based Powder lists 54 ingredients on its label

54 98th percentile a longer ingredient list than 98% of the 359,392 products we track

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

359,392 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 54 (98th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2: 6,050 products (2%)
2–4: 24,522 products (7%)
4–6: 31,054 products (9%)
6–8: 30,981 products (9%)
8–10: 31,618 products (9%)
10–12: 29,943 products (8%)
12–14: 28,403 products (8%)
14–16: 27,417 products (8%)
16–18: 24,508 products (7%)
18–20: 19,062 products (5%)
20–22: 14,679 products (4%)
22–24: 12,238 products (3%)
24–26: 10,830 products (3%)
26–28: 9,344 products (3%)
28–30: 7,955 products (2%)
30–32: 6,753 products (2%)
32–34: 5,918 products (2%)
34–36: 5,282 products (1%)
36–38: 4,531 products (1%)
38–40: 4,063 products (1%)
40 and above: 24,241 products (7%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. No category with enough published products was available for this record, so the comparison runs against the whole published catalogue.