Raspberry
Raspberry appears in 775 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.
What the data can answer
Raspberry appears in 775 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.
- 775
- catalogued products
- #780
- usage rank of 247,206
- 309
- named brands represented
- 51%
- average depth down ingredient lists
Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.
Raspberry sits in the busiest tenth of the catalog (#780 / 247,206)
- Usage rank
- #780
- of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, listed in more products than 99.7% of them.
- Typical depth in an ingredient list
- 51%
- Mean relative depth 51% across 777 parsed labels, slot 17.0 on average. Raspberry tends to sit in the lower half of the list. Depth is location on the label, not a measured dose.
Derived by this site from the ingredient lists of every catalogued product (Open Food Facts), recomputed on each data refresh. 247,206 ingredients have at least one appearance and are ranked here. Usage and list position describe prevalence, not safety.
Reading this ingredient record
Use prevalence before concern
Only 19.6% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Raspberry spans 309 named brands and is led by the Snacks group. Start with 100% Flavored Juices; 100% Fruit Strip; 100% juice when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 90.9/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.
309 named brands carry this ingredient
The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 693 of 754 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.
Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.
What else is usually in the same product as Raspberry
Across the 775 products on this site that list Raspberry, these flagged additives appear alongside it most often. The comparison column is how often each one appears across every product with a parsed ingredient list, so the two figures are measured over the same set. Red 40 shows up about 1.9x more often with Raspberry than in the catalogue at large.
| Additive | Shared products | Share of Raspberry products | Share of all products |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red 40 | 78 | 10.1% | 5.4% |
| Blue 1 | 70 | 9% | 4.2% |
| Yellow 5 | 46 | 5.9% | 4.8% |
| Yellow 6 | 40 | 5.2% | 3.4% |
| Monk fruit extract | 30 | 3.9% | 0.5% |
Co-occurrence describes what manufacturers formulate together. It is not a claim that these additives interact, and it carries no regulatory meaning. Counted over products with parsed ingredient lists; Open Food Facts, 2026-09-01.
How do the sampled products compare?
Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.
Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Raspberry
Products Containing Raspberry
16 busy labels from the 775 indexed products that list Raspberry:
Peer ingredients with comparable catalog mass (near “Asiago Cheese”)
High-volume peers for Raspberry: 775 products, mean screening score 90.9/100. Catalog-mass neighbours in view: Asiago Cheese; Autolyzed Yeast; Spinach Powder. Axes below stay distinct so count-neighbors do not duplicate score-neighbors.
Similar product count
Nearest other ingredients by Open Food Facts product count (floored at ≥50).
Similar mean product score
Nearest other ingredients by mean product screening score (floored at ≥50 scored products), distinct from the count row.
Using the Raspberry evidence
Start from Raspberry's 775 catalogued appearances and the attached source fields, then open the product rows that match your use case.
- Review the sampled product records that list Raspberry to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. Open product sample
- Place Raspberry next to “Autolyzed Yeast” (or another peer) using the same FDA/CSPI and prevalence fields. Compare a peer
- See the join rules behind screening scores before reading them as dietary advice. See source joins
This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.
Questions readers ask about Raspberry
Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Raspberry? ▼
This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Raspberry, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#780 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.
Which product shelves show up most often with Raspberry? ▼
Raspberry ranks in the top decile by product count (#780 of 247,206), appearing in 775 indexed products led by Snacks. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.
Why is Raspberry so common on ingredient lists? ▼
The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Raspberry appears in 775 products (#780 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.
Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Raspberry). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.