Safe

Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea

by Ito En (North America) Inc.

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0835143000033 · Ito En (North America) Inc. · Plant-based foods and beverages. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0835143000033 · Serving size 16.9 OZA (500 ml)

The verdict

Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea by Ito En (North America) Inc. scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 4 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. Its short parsed label begins Purified Water, Oolong Tea, Ascorbic Acid, so the useful next step is to inspect those few components directly rather than infer from the composite score. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 4 analyzed
Group 1
Unprocessed
B
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

95/100

Grade A+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 1

Unprocessed or minimally processed

Nutrition Grade

B

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

43000033 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-SHORT 4 ing. REG-SPARSE 25% reg. NOVA-G1 G1 unprocessed NUTRI-B Nutri-B RANK-LONG Len top 81% LEAD-RARE Ascorbic Acid PHOTO-FINISH Cocoa Blend · ±0 BOOK-OFF …000033 · July 2026

1 of 4 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Ascorbic Acid). Source sheet 43000033 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Cocoa Blend · Nearest score peer is Cocoa Blend at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

The Nutri-Score algorithm returned its second band for this label. That grade typically describes a nutrition panel whose favourable components register clearly in the model without fully offsetting its energy or sodium terms. Because the calculation is a single points balance rather than a set of independent thresholds, a strong fibre or protein figure can lift a panel into this band even where one penalised nutrient sits high. The grade summarises the declared panel alone and carries no information about the additive ratings screened below.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Organic Robust Golden Ool…100/1002. Cocoa Blend: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Cocoa Blend100/1003. Natural Coffee Robust Rich Coffee Flavor: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Natural Coffee Robust Ric…100/1004. Original Roasted Wheat-Bran & Molasses: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Original Roasted Wheat-Br…100/1005. Organic Rose Green Tea: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Organic Rose Green Tea100/100
High-band neighbours for Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea (100/100) outside Ito En (North America) Inc..
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea
100/100
Cocoa Blend
100/100
Natural Coffee Robust Rich Coffee Flavor
100/100
Original Roasted Wheat-Bran & Molasses
100/100
Organic Rose Green Tea
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 78,450 products we've scored in the Plant-based foods and beverages category, the average safety score is 97.7/100. Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea scores 2.3 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 97.7/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Plant-based foods and beverages products

Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea lists 4 ingredients on its label

4 19th percentile a longer ingredient list than 19% of the 63,434 products we track

0–2: 3,907 products (6%). Below this entry. 2–4: 7,921 products (12%). Below this entry. 4–6: 8,845 products (14%). This entry sits in this band. 6–8: 7,032 products (11%). Above this entry. 8–10: 6,320 products (10%). Above this entry. 10–12: 4,190 products (7%). Above this entry. 12–14: 3,449 products (5%). Above this entry. 14–16: 3,051 products (5%). Above this entry. 16–18: 2,493 products (4%). Above this entry. 18–20: 2,053 products (3%). Above this entry. 20–22: 1,808 products (3%). Above this entry. 22–24: 1,758 products (3%). Above this entry. 24–26: 1,623 products (3%). Above this entry. 26–28: 1,606 products (3%). Above this entry. 28–30: 1,360 products (2%). Above this entry. 30–32: 1,198 products (2%). Above this entry. 32–34: 1,081 products (2%). Above this entry. 34–36: 901 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 649 products (1%). Above this entry. 38–40: 534 products (1%). Above this entry. 40–42: 1,655 products (3%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Plant-based foods and beverages product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

63,434 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 4 (19th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
3,907 products (6%)
2–4
7,921 products (12%)
4–6
8,845 products (14%)
6–8
7,032 products (11%)
8–10
6,320 products (10%)
10–12
4,190 products (7%)
12–14
3,449 products (5%)
14–16
3,051 products (5%)
16–18
2,493 products (4%)
18–20
2,053 products (3%)
20–22
1,808 products (3%)
22–24
1,758 products (3%)
24–26
1,623 products (3%)
26–28
1,606 products (3%)
28–30
1,360 products (2%)
30–32
1,198 products (2%)
32–34
1,081 products (2%)
34–36
901 products (1%)
36–38
649 products (1%)
38–40
534 products (1%)
40 and above
1,655 products (3%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 63,434 Plant-based foods and beverages products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Purified water, organic oolong tea, ascorbic acid (vitamin c).

Categories

Plant-based foods and beverages Beverages Hot beverages Plant-based beverages Teas Tea-based beverages Iced teas Oolong teas

High-score cross-brand comparables for Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea

Neighbours outside Ito En (North America) Inc. with screening scores in the same high band as Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Ito En (North America) Inc.; these peers cross brands.

Check the compact label closely

Check the compact label closely

Organic Robust Golden Oolong Tea has a shorter ingredient list than 81% of its Plant-based foods and beverages category comparison set. A short list is descriptive, not a safety verdict, so inspect the named ingredients directly.

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0835143000033: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.