Safe

Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime

by Maine Original Tea

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0862938000046 · Maine Original Tea · Plant-based foods and beverages. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0862938000046 · Serving size 8 fl oz PREPARED) | (MAKES (30 ml)

The verdict

Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime by Maine Original Tea scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 7 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. This is a focused 7-component label led by Kettle-brewed Oolong Tea, Water, Oolong Tea; compare those leading ingredients with the product's processing and nutrition fields before deciding whether it fits your goal. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 7 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
D
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

63/100

Grade C+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

D

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

38000046 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-FOCUSED 7 ing. REG-SPARSE 14% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-D Nutri-D RANK-LONG Len top 62% LEAD-RARE Citric Acid PHOTO-FINISH Finest Kind, Rooibos · ±0 BOOK-OFF …000046 · July 2026

1 of 7 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Citric Acid). Source sheet 38000046 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Finest Kind, Rooibos Tea Orange Vanilla · Nearest score peer is Finest Kind, Rooibos Tea Orange Vanilla at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

This label falls in the fourth Nutri-Score band. The model arrives there when its penalty terms — energy density, sugars, saturated fat, sodium — carry more weight in the calculation than the fibre, protein and produce content it credits. The band covers a wide span of the points scale, so position within it is not visible from the letter alone. The grade reflects the declared nutrition panel and is unrelated to the additive ratings listed below, which come from different bodies applying different criteria.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong …100/1002. Finest Kind, Rooibos Tea Orange Vanilla: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Finest Kind, Rooibos Tea …100/1003. Finest Kind, 1960 Black Tea, Lemon Juice, Cane Sugar: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Finest Kind, 1960 Black T…100/1004. Hawg Rup: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Hawg Rup100/1005. Hydrolyzed Whey Protein Isolate: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Hydrolyzed Whey Protein I…100/100
High-band neighbours for Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime (100/100) outside Maine Original Tea.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime
100/100
Finest Kind, Rooibos Tea Orange Vanilla
100/100
Finest Kind, 1960 Black Tea, Lemon Juice, Cane Sugar
100/100
Hawg Rup
100/100
Hydrolyzed Whey Protein Isolate
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 78,450 products we've scored in the Plant-based foods and beverages category, the average safety score is 97.7/100. Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime scores 2.3 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 97.7/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Plant-based foods and beverages products

Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime lists 7 ingredients on its label

7 38th percentile a longer ingredient list than 38% of the 63,434 products we track

0–2: 3,907 products (6%). Below this entry. 2–4: 7,921 products (12%). Below this entry. 4–6: 8,845 products (14%). Below this entry. 6–8: 7,032 products (11%). This entry sits in this band. 8–10: 6,320 products (10%). Above this entry. 10–12: 4,190 products (7%). Above this entry. 12–14: 3,449 products (5%). Above this entry. 14–16: 3,051 products (5%). Above this entry. 16–18: 2,493 products (4%). Above this entry. 18–20: 2,053 products (3%). Above this entry. 20–22: 1,808 products (3%). Above this entry. 22–24: 1,758 products (3%). Above this entry. 24–26: 1,623 products (3%). Above this entry. 26–28: 1,606 products (3%). Above this entry. 28–30: 1,360 products (2%). Above this entry. 30–32: 1,198 products (2%). Above this entry. 32–34: 1,081 products (2%). Above this entry. 34–36: 901 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 649 products (1%). Above this entry. 38–40: 534 products (1%). Above this entry. 40–42: 1,655 products (3%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Plant-based foods and beverages product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

63,434 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 7 (38th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
3,907 products (6%)
2–4
7,921 products (12%)
4–6
8,845 products (14%)
6–8
7,032 products (11%)
8–10
6,320 products (10%)
10–12
4,190 products (7%)
12–14
3,449 products (5%)
14–16
3,051 products (5%)
16–18
2,493 products (4%)
18–20
2,053 products (3%)
20–22
1,808 products (3%)
22–24
1,758 products (3%)
24–26
1,623 products (3%)
26–28
1,606 products (3%)
28–30
1,360 products (2%)
30–32
1,198 products (2%)
32–34
1,081 products (2%)
34–36
901 products (1%)
36–38
649 products (1%)
38–40
534 products (1%)
40 and above
1,655 products (3%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 63,434 Plant-based foods and beverages products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Kettle-brewed oolong tea (water, oolong tea), lime flavor, honey, citric acid, ginger extract

Categories

Plant-based foods and beverages Beverages Hot beverages Plant-based beverages Teas Tea-based beverages Iced teas Oolong teas

High-score cross-brand comparables for Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime

Neighbours outside Maine Original Tea with screening scores in the same high band as Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime (100/100 here). No other Maine Original Tea products are linked from this barcode; these peers compare across brands only.

Trace this label’s coverage

Trace this label’s coverage

1 of 7 parsed ingredients on Finest Kind, 1933 Oolong Tea, Ginger, Lime match at least one source registry. Use the ingredient records to see which entries carry source context and which remain unmatched.

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0862938000046: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.