Safe

Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea

by Nature's Promise

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0688267149566 · Nature's Promise · Beverages. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0688267149566 · Serving size 8 OZA (240 ml)

The verdict

Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea by Nature's Promise scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 6 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. This is a focused 6-component label led by Filtered Water, Sugar, Black Tea Concentrate; compare those leading ingredients with the product's processing and nutrition fields before deciding whether it fits your goal. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 6 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
D
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

63/100

Grade C+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

D

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

67149566 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-FOCUSED 6 ing. REG-PART 33% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-D Nutri-D RANK-LONG Len top 76% LEAD-RARE Citric Acid PHOTO-FINISH Ahold, raspberry & · ±0 BOOK-OFF …149566 · July 2026

2 of 6 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Citric Acid). Source sheet 67149566 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Ahold, raspberry & creme sandwich cookies, naturally flavored raspberry & creme sandwich cookies · Nearest score peer is Ahold, raspberry & creme sandwich cookies, naturally flavored raspberry & creme sandwich cookies at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

This label falls in the fourth Nutri-Score band. The model arrives there when its penalty terms — energy density, sugars, saturated fat, sodium — carry more weight in the calculation than the fibre, protein and produce content it credits. The band covers a wide span of the points scale, so position within it is not visible from the letter alone. The grade reflects the declared nutrition panel and is unrelated to the additive ratings listed below, which come from different bodies applying different criteria.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Nature's promise, souther…100/1002. Ahold, raspberry & creme sandwich cookies, naturally flavored raspberry & creme sandwich cookies: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Ahold, raspberry & creme …100/1003. Original brown & serve enriched rolls, original: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Original brown & serve en…100/1004. Brown & Serve Wheat Rolls: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Brown & Serve Wheat Rolls100/1005. Ahold, nature's promise, organic tea, peach chamomile: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Ahold, nature's promise, …100/100
High-band neighbours for Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea (100/100) outside Nature's Promise.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea
100/100
Ahold, raspberry & creme sandwich cookies, naturally flavored raspberry & creme sandwich cookies
100/100
Original brown & serve enriched rolls, original
100/100
Brown & Serve Wheat Rolls
100/100
Ahold, nature's promise, organic tea, peach chamomile
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 32,623 products we've scored in the Beverages category, the average safety score is 90.5/100. Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea scores 9.5 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 90.5/100), so it is a comparatively strong pick for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Beverages products

Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea lists 6 ingredients on its label

6 24th percentile a longer ingredient list than 24% of the 16,917 products we track

0–2: 161 products (1%). Below this entry. 2–4: 2,220 products (13%). Below this entry. 4–6: 1,699 products (10%). Below this entry. 6–8: 2,564 products (15%). This entry sits in this band. 8–10: 2,835 products (17%). Above this entry. 10–12: 2,099 products (12%). Above this entry. 12–14: 1,442 products (9%). Above this entry. 14–16: 997 products (6%). Above this entry. 16–18: 595 products (4%). Above this entry. 18–20: 402 products (2%). Above this entry. 20–22: 347 products (2%). Above this entry. 22–24: 277 products (2%). Above this entry. 24–26: 256 products (2%). Above this entry. 26–28: 216 products (1%). Above this entry. 28–30: 131 products (1%). Above this entry. 30–32: 66 products (0%). Above this entry. 32–34: 51 products (0%). Above this entry. 34–36: 47 products (0%). Above this entry. 36–38: 43 products (0%). Above this entry. 38–40: 51 products (0%). Above this entry. 40–42: 418 products (2%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Beverages product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

16,917 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 6 (24th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
161 products (1%)
2–4
2,220 products (13%)
4–6
1,699 products (10%)
6–8
2,564 products (15%)
8–10
2,835 products (17%)
10–12
2,099 products (12%)
12–14
1,442 products (9%)
14–16
997 products (6%)
16–18
595 products (4%)
18–20
402 products (2%)
20–22
347 products (2%)
22–24
277 products (2%)
24–26
256 products (2%)
26–28
216 products (1%)
28–30
131 products (1%)
30–32
66 products (0%)
32–34
51 products (0%)
34–36
47 products (0%)
36–38
43 products (0%)
38–40
51 products (0%)
40 and above
418 products (2%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 16,917 Beverages products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Filtered water, organic sugar, organic black tea concentrate, fruit extract (color), citric acid.

Categories

Beverages Tea-based beverages Iced teas

High-score cross-brand comparables for Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea

Neighbours outside Nature's Promise with screening scores in the same high band as Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Nature's Promise; these peers cross brands.

Check the compact label closely

Check the compact label closely

Nature's promise, southern style organic sweet tea has a shorter ingredient list than 76% of its Beverages category comparison set. A short list is descriptive, not a safety verdict, so inspect the named ingredients directly.

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0688267149566: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.