Safe

Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs

by Field Roast

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0638031002511 · Field Roast · Meat alternatives. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0638031002511 · Serving size 1 link (56 g)

The verdict

Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs by Field Roast scores 95/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 26 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 1 ingredient is flagged for caution. The 26-component label is layered, beginning with Water, Canola Oil, Pea Protein. Start with any flagged rows, then check the nutrition grade and serving size instead of treating one roll-up score as the whole decision. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

95/100
Safe safety score
1
One flagged · of 26 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
D
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

60/100

Grade C+

Ingredient Safety

95/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

D

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

31002511 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 95/100 FLAG-ONE 1 flagged LEN-LAYERED 26 ing. REG-SPARSE 19% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-D Nutri-D RANK-MID Len top 36% LEAD-FLAG Carrageenan PHOTO-FINISH Imitation Crab Flake · ±0 BOOK-OFF …002511 · July 2026

5 of 26 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Carrageenan). Source sheet 31002511 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Imitation Crab Flake Style with real Snow Crab · Nearest score peer is Imitation Crab Flake Style with real Snow Crab at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

This label falls in the fourth Nutri-Score band. The model arrives there when its penalty terms — energy density, sugars, saturated fat, sodium — carry more weight in the calculation than the fibre, protein and produce content it credits. The band covers a wide span of the points scale, so position within it is not visible from the letter alone. The grade reflects the declared nutrition panel and is unrelated to the additive ratings listed below, which come from different bodies applying different criteria.

This label parsed into a long component list. Where many entries are screened at once, the composite tends to reflect the overall mix of registry ratings returned rather than the rating of any one entry. Longer declarations also carry more sub-listed and compound entries, where a parenthetical group is resolved into its parts, so the parsed count can exceed what a reader counts on the packaging.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs: 95/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Signature Stadium Plant-B…95/1002. Imitation Crab Flake Style with real Snow Crab: 95/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Imitation Crab Flake Styl…95/1003. Crab Flavored Seafood: 95/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Crab Flavored Seafood95/1004. Classic Southern Style Plant-Based Breakfast Sausage, Classic Southern Style: 95/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Classic Southern Style Pl…95/1005. Baker's Golden Dairy - S'mores Milk: 95/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Baker's Golden Dairy - S'…95/100
High-band neighbours for Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs (95/100) outside Field Roast.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs
95/100
Imitation Crab Flake Style with real Snow Crab
95/100
Crab Flavored Seafood
95/100
Classic Southern Style Plant-Based Breakfast Sausage, Classic Southern Style
95/100
Baker's Golden Dairy - S'mores Milk
95/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 611 products we've scored in the Meat alternatives category, the average safety score is 98.7/100. Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs scores 3.7 points below that category average (95/100 vs. 98.7/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Meat alternatives products

Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs lists 26 ingredients on its label

26 64th percentile a longer ingredient list than 64% of the 141 products we track

2–4: 2 products (1%). Below this entry. 4–6: 3 products (2%). Below this entry. 6–8: 3 products (2%). Below this entry. 8–10: 6 products (4%). Below this entry. 10–12: 3 products (2%). Below this entry. 12–14: 11 products (8%). Below this entry. 14–16: 12 products (9%). Below this entry. 16–18: 14 products (10%). Below this entry. 18–20: 12 products (9%). Below this entry. 20–22: 10 products (7%). Below this entry. 22–24: 10 products (7%). Below this entry. 24–26: 4 products (3%). Below this entry. 26–28: 12 products (9%). This entry sits in this band. 28–30: 5 products (4%). Above this entry. 30–32: 3 products (2%). Above this entry. 32–34: 2 products (1%). Above this entry. 34–36: 2 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 5 products (4%). Above this entry. 38–40: 5 products (4%). Above this entry. 40–42: 17 products (12%). Above this entry. This product 2 42 every published Meat alternatives product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

141 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 26 (64th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

2–4
2 products (1%)
4–6
3 products (2%)
6–8
3 products (2%)
8–10
6 products (4%)
10–12
3 products (2%)
12–14
11 products (8%)
14–16
12 products (9%)
16–18
14 products (10%)
18–20
12 products (9%)
20–22
10 products (7%)
22–24
10 products (7%)
24–26
4 products (3%)
26–28
12 products (9%)
28–30
5 products (4%)
30–32
3 products (2%)
32–34
2 products (1%)
34–36
2 products (1%)
36–38
5 products (4%)
38–40
5 products (4%)
40 and above
17 products (12%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 141 Meat alternatives products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Ingredient Safety Analysis

How the 95/100 score is built

Screening starts at 100 and subtracts severity-weighted FDA SAFFA / CSPI flags (1 flagged of 26 labeled). The floor is 0 when deductions exceed 100.

Full Ingredient List

WATER, CANOLA OIL, PEA PROTEIN, POTATO STARCH, METHYLCELLULOSE, CARRAGEENAN, VITAL WHEAT GLUTEN, BROWN RICE PROTEIN, VINEGAR, FABA BEAN PROTEIN, BEET POWDER (COLOR), SEA SALT, NATURAL FLAVOR, CANE SUGAR, GARLIC POWDER, HARDWOOD SMOKED SUGAR, KONJAC FLOUR, POTASSIUM CHLORIDE, ONION POWDER, XANTHAN GUM, SPICES (BLACK PEPPER, NUTMEG), CHERRY POWDER (TO PROMOTE COLOR RETENTION), PAPRIKA.

Categories

Meat alternatives

High-score cross-brand comparables for Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs

Neighbours outside Field Roast with screening scores in the same high band as Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs (95/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Field Roast; these peers cross brands.

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Carrageenan is the first flagged ingredient selected from Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs's parsed label. Start with that ingredient’s source context, then compare the rest of this 26-ingredient record.

  • Inspect the FDA SAFFA and CSPI context attached to Carrageenan. Open Carrageenan
  • Compare Signature Stadium Plant-Based Hot Dogs's 1 flagged ingredients with a product from the same score neighbourhood. Compare labels
  • Check how caution flags contribute to the derived screening score before drawing a dietary conclusion. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0638031002511: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.