Caution

Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit

by Monster Energy Company

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0070847031116 Β· Monster Energy Company Β· Beverages. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0070847031116 Β· Serving size 8 OZA (240 ml)

The verdict

Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit by Monster Energy Company scores 70/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 33 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 2 ingredients are flagged for caution. The source parser split this into a very long 33-component record, beginning with Brewed Tea, Filtered Water, Black & White Tea Solids. That density can include amounts and label fragments, so verify the physical label before relying on ingredient order or completeness. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

70/100
Caution safety score
2
Few flagged Β· of 33 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
C
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

53/100

Grade C-

Ingredient Safety

70/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

C

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

47031116 Β· Open Food Facts Β· July 2026

Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit label screening desk

SCORE-CAUT 70/100 FLAG-FEW 2 flagged LEN-DENSE 33 ing. REG-SPARSE 27% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-C Nutri-C RANK-SHORT Len top 3% LEAD-FLAG Acesulfame Potassium PHOTO-FINISH Energy shake Β· Β±0 BOOK-OFF …031116 Β· July 2026

9 of 33 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Acesulfame Potassium). Source sheet 47031116 Β· Open Food Facts Β· July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology Β· Read with nearest score peer: Energy shake Β· Nearest score peer is Energy shake at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

The composite for this product falls in the second band of the four-tier framework. That band collects labels whose registry-rated components pull the derived score down measurably without dominating it. Position inside a band is not visible from the band name, and two labels sharing it can differ in how many components were rated and how severely. This is a threshold on an index computed here from public data, not a regulatory classification of any kind; the exact cut-offs are published on the methodology page.

Nutri-Score settled on its middle grade here, the band the algorithm produces when the penalty and credit sides of its nutrient ledger come out close to balanced. A mid-scale grade is a statement about the panel as a whole rather than about any single nutrient, and products arrive at it by very different routes: a moderate profile across every term, or high marks on some offset by heavy penalties on others. The grade is computed separately from the ingredient screen below and the two are not comparable measures.

This label parsed into a long component list. Where many entries are screened at once, the composite tends to reflect the overall mix of registry ratings returned rather than the rating of any one entry. Longer declarations also carry more sub-listed and compound entries, where a parenthetical group is resolved into its parts, so the parsed count can exceed what a reader counts on the packaging.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit: 70/100 Β· 100% of the leader Β· rank #11. Rehab tea + dragon fruit …70/1002. Energy shake: 70/100 Β· 100% of the leader Β· rank #22. Energy shake70/1003. Zero Ultra Energy Drink: 70/100 Β· 100% of the leader Β· rank #33. Zero Ultra Energy Drink70/1004. Ultra Paradise: 70/100 Β· 100% of the leader Β· rank #44. Ultra Paradise70/1005. Monster Energy Ultra Violet: 70/100 Β· 100% of the leader Β· rank #55. Monster Energy Ultra Viol…70/100
Nearest cross-brand screening scores for Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit (70/100 on 33 parsed ingredients).
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit
70/100
Energy shake
70/100
Zero Ultra Energy Drink
70/100
Ultra Paradise
70/100
Monster Energy Ultra Violet
70/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 32,623 products we've scored in the Beverages category, the average safety score is 90.5/100. Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit scores 20.5 points below that category average (70/100 vs. 90.5/100), so it is a comparatively weaker pick for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Beverages products

Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit lists 33 ingredients on its label

33 97th percentile a longer ingredient list than 97% of the 16,917 products we track

0–2: 161 products (1%). Below this entry. 2–4: 2,220 products (13%). Below this entry. 4–6: 1,699 products (10%). Below this entry. 6–8: 2,564 products (15%). Below this entry. 8–10: 2,835 products (17%). Below this entry. 10–12: 2,099 products (12%). Below this entry. 12–14: 1,442 products (9%). Below this entry. 14–16: 997 products (6%). Below this entry. 16–18: 595 products (4%). Below this entry. 18–20: 402 products (2%). Below this entry. 20–22: 347 products (2%). Below this entry. 22–24: 277 products (2%). Below this entry. 24–26: 256 products (2%). Below this entry. 26–28: 216 products (1%). Below this entry. 28–30: 131 products (1%). Below this entry. 30–32: 66 products (0%). Below this entry. 32–34: 51 products (0%). This entry sits in this band. 34–36: 47 products (0%). Above this entry. 36–38: 43 products (0%). Above this entry. 38–40: 51 products (0%). Above this entry. 40–42: 418 products (2%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Beverages product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

16,917 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 33 (97th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
161 products (1%)
2–4
2,220 products (13%)
4–6
1,699 products (10%)
6–8
2,564 products (15%)
8–10
2,835 products (17%)
10–12
2,099 products (12%)
12–14
1,442 products (9%)
14–16
997 products (6%)
16–18
595 products (4%)
18–20
402 products (2%)
20–22
347 products (2%)
22–24
277 products (2%)
24–26
256 products (2%)
26–28
216 products (1%)
28–30
131 products (1%)
30–32
66 products (0%)
32–34
51 products (0%)
34–36
47 products (0%)
36–38
43 products (0%)
38–40
51 products (0%)
40 and above
418 products (2%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists Β· July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 16,917 Beverages products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Brewed tea (filtered water, black & white tea solids), glucose, white grape juice concentrate, taurine, natural & artificial flavors, citric acid, sodium citrate, apple juice concentrate, panax ginseng flavor, magnesium lactate dihydrate, calcium lactate pentahydrate, monopotassium phosphate, caffeine, concentrated coconut water, red dragonfruit puree, niacinamide (vit. b3), salt, sucralose, b-calcium pantothenate (vit. b5), acesulfame potassium, l-carnitine l-tartrate, inositol, acai puree, goji berry puree, mangosteen juice concentrate, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vit. b6), cyanocobalamin (vit. b12).

Other products containing Magnesium Lactate Dihydrate

Magnesium Lactate Dihydrate is the least common ingredient on this label, appearing in 5 products across the catalog. See its safety profile.

Categories

Beverages Carbonated drinks Sodas Energy drinks

Mid-score cross-brand comparables for Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit

Neighbours outside Monster Energy Company near Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit's mid-band score (70/100). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Monster Energy Company; these peers cross brands.

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Acesulfame Potassium is the first flagged ingredient selected from Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit's parsed label. Start with that ingredient’s source context, then compare the rest of this 33-ingredient record.

  • Inspect the FDA SAFFA and CSPI context attached to Acesulfame Potassium. Open Acesulfame Potassium
  • Compare Rehab tea + dragon fruit + energy drink, tea + dragon fruit's 2 flagged ingredients with a product from the same score neighbourhood. Compare labels
  • Check how caution flags contribute to the derived screening score before drawing a dietary conclusion. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0070847031116: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.