Bacillus Thuringiensis
Bacillus Thuringiensis appears in 3 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.
What the data can answer
Bacillus Thuringiensis appears in 3 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.
- 3
- catalogued products
- #35,091
- usage rank of 247,206
- 3
- named brands represented
- 44%
- average depth down ingredient lists
Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.
Bacillus Thuringiensis: above-median product count (beats 85.8% of ranked ingredients)
- Usage rank
- #35,091
- of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 11,093 others that also appear in exactly 3 products.
- Typical depth in an ingredient list
- 44%
- Of the way down the captured list, averaged across the 3 products listing it (mean slot 38.7). Bacillus Thuringiensis usually falls in the upper half of the list; this position does not measure its amount because source formatting, compound ingredients and labeling exceptions vary.
Derived by this site from the ingredient lists of every catalogued product (Open Food Facts), recomputed on each data refresh. 247,206 ingredients have at least one appearance and are ranked here. Usage and list position describe prevalence, not safety.
What this page can and cannot answer
A clean co-occurrence count is not a safety clearance
No linked product currently contains a separately flagged ingredient, but zero co-occurrence is an absence-of-evidence result, not regulatory approval. The practical reading is about use: Bacillus Thuringiensis reaches 3 named brands, most often appears under Plant-based foods and beverages, and typically sits in the upper half of the list. Product examples include Farofa de Mandioca Tradicional; Flocao De Milho Kaito Yellow Corn Flour 500g; Plant-based All-in-one Shake. Check the current label and authoritative source databases when the decision involves allergies, dosage, pregnancy, or a medical condition.
0% of linked products currently carry a separately flagged ingredient
Most NOVA-tagged examples land in Group 4 (1 of 1), yet the products span unrelated categories. That contrast matters: processing class can describe how a food was made while saying nothing decisive about this ingredient's regulatory status. Use the linked examples to understand formulation context, and leave the unanswered toxicology or individual-sensitivity question unanswered.
Next check: verify the unresolved source rating directly instead of converting zero co-flags into reassurance.
Products Containing Bacillus Thuringiensis
Every indexed product currently listing Bacillus Thuringiensis (3 total):
Parallel catalog profiles to Bacillus Thuringiensis
Use the lists below to place Bacillus Thuringiensis against similar footprints (3 products).
Similar mean product score
Score-axis peers only, mean screening score among ingredients with ≥50 scored products, not a second count list.
What to do with this Bacillus Thuringiensis record
3 product rows plus any FDA/CSPI fields on Bacillus Thuringiensis are the evidence base — drill into the listings that matter for your decision.
- Check the listed products containing Bacillus Thuringiensis before treating the aggregate count as a personal conclusion. See listed products
- Browse another ingredient record and keep the same FDA/CSPI and prevalence fields in view. Compare a peer
- See the join rules behind screening scores before reading them as dietary advice. Read the methodology
This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.
Questions readers ask about Bacillus Thuringiensis
Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Bacillus Thuringiensis? ▼
This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Bacillus Thuringiensis, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#35,091 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.
Where does Bacillus Thuringiensis show up across the catalog? ▼
Bacillus Thuringiensis sits above the median for catalog prevalence (3 products, #35,091 of 247,206) across 3 named brands. Category mix varies — use the linked records rather than treating any single shelf as representative.
Why is Bacillus Thuringiensis so common on ingredient lists? ▼
The current source record does not specify a technical effect for Bacillus Thuringiensis. Its in the upper half of the list and product examples are shown without guessing why manufacturers include it.
Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Bacillus Thuringiensis). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.