Acerola Fruit

Acerola Fruit appears in 11 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.

What the data can answer

Acerola Fruit appears in 11 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.

11
catalogued products
#14,190
usage rank of 247,206
4
named brands represented
61%
average depth down ingredient lists

Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.

Acerola Fruit sits in the busiest tenth of the catalog (#14,190 / 247,206)

Usage rank
#14,190
of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 989 others that also appear in exactly 11 products.
Typical depth in an ingredient list
61%
Mean relative depth 61% across 11 parsed labels, slot 37.9 on average. Acerola Fruit tends to sit in the lower half of the list. Depth is location on the label, not a measured dose.

Computed from parsed product ingredient lists (Open Food Facts). The ranking covers 247,206 ingredients that appear at least once. Neither usage rank nor label depth is a safety clearance.

Reading this ingredient record

A clean co-occurrence count is not a safety clearance

No linked product currently contains a separately flagged ingredient, but zero co-occurrence is an absence-of-evidence result, not regulatory approval. The practical reading is about use: Acerola Fruit reaches 4 named brands, most often appears under Dietary supplements, and typically sits in the lower half of the list. Product examples include AG1 Daily Foundational Nutrition; AG1 Tropical; Daily Foundational Nutrition. Check the current label and authoritative source databases when the decision involves allergies, dosage, pregnancy, or a medical condition.

0% of linked products currently carry a separately flagged ingredient

Most NOVA-tagged examples land in Group 4 (11 of 11), yet the products span unrelated categories. That contrast matters: processing class can describe how a food was made while saying nothing decisive about this ingredient's regulatory status. Use the linked examples to understand formulation context, and leave the unanswered toxicology or individual-sensitivity question unanswered.

Next check: verify the unresolved source rating directly instead of converting zero co-flags into reassurance.

How do the sampled products compare?

Each point is one of the 11 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.

Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Acerola Fruit

Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 11 entities by Safety score (X) and Flagged ingredients on label (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High score, still flaggedLow score, more flaggedHigh score, fewer flaggedLow score, fewer flagged 99.9100.0100.0100100.0100.0100.1 00.00.00.1 Safety score Flagged ingredients on label Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Acerola Fruit AG1 Daily Foundational NutritionAG1 TropicalDaily Foundational NutritionDark Chocolate Chip Superfood BarINNO GREENSOrganic SupergreensPaleovalley superfood barSuperfood BarSuperfood Bar Dark Chocolate ChipWhole Food Dietary SupplementFlex food
Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

High-volume peers for Acerola Fruit

Acerola Fruit sits among other busy catalog rows (11 products, mean score 100/100). Count peers and score peers are listed separately on purpose.

Similar mean product score

Score-axis peers only, mean screening score among ingredients with ≥50 scored products, not a second count list.

Using the Acerola Fruit evidence

11 product rows plus any FDA/CSPI fields on Acerola Fruit are the evidence base — drill into the listings that matter for your decision.

  • Check the listed products containing Acerola Fruit before treating the aggregate count as a personal conclusion. Browse linked labels
  • Browse another ingredient record and keep the same FDA/CSPI and prevalence fields in view. Browse ingredient records
  • Check the methodology for how FDA SAFFA, CSPI, and Open Food Facts rows are joined on this site. See source joins

This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.

Acerola Fruit — common follow-ups

Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Acerola Fruit?

This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Acerola Fruit, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#14,190 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.

Which product shelves show up most often with Acerola Fruit?

Acerola Fruit ranks in the top decile by product count (#14,190 of 247,206), appearing in 11 indexed products led by Dietary supplements. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.

Why is Acerola Fruit so common on ingredient lists?

The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Acerola Fruit appears in 11 products (#14,190 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.

Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Acerola Fruit). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.