éMulsifiant

éMulsifiant appears in 35 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.

What the data can answer

éMulsifiant appears in 35 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.

35
catalogued products
#6,340
usage rank of 247,206
32
named brands represented
69%
average depth down ingredient lists

Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.

éMulsifiant: top-decile catalog footprint (#6,340 of 247,206)

Usage rank
#6,340
of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 111 others that also appear in exactly 35 products.
Typical depth in an ingredient list
69%
Averaged label depth puts éMulsifiant in the lower half of the list (69% of list length, mean slot 16.2). Compound ingredients and OCR noise mean this cannot stand in for quantity.

Computed from parsed product ingredient lists (Open Food Facts). The ranking covers 247,206 ingredients that appear at least once. Neither usage rank nor label depth is a safety clearance.

Reading this ingredient record

Use prevalence before concern

Only 8.6% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: éMulsifiant spans 32 named brands and is led by the Snacks group. Start with Baby Panettone; Chewing gum fraise; Chewing-gum à la menthe when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 98.7/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.

32 named brands carry this ingredient

The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 34 of 34 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.

Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.

How do the sampled products compare?

Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.

Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing éMulsifiant

Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 16 entities by Safety score (X) and Flagged ingredients on label (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High score, still flaggedLow score, more flaggedHigh score, fewer flaggedLow score, fewer flagged 80859095100105 00.511.5 Safety score Flagged ingredients on label Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing éMulsifiant
Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

High-volume peers for éMulsifiant

éMulsifiant sits among other busy catalog rows (35 products, mean score 98.7/100). Count peers and score peers are listed separately on purpose.

Similar mean product score

Score-axis peers only, mean screening score among ingredients with ≥50 scored products, not a second count list.

What to do with this éMulsifiant record

Start from éMulsifiant's 35 catalogued appearances and the attached source fields, then open the product rows that match your use case.

  • Review the sampled product records that list éMulsifiant to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. Browse linked labels
  • Browse another ingredient record and keep the same FDA/CSPI and prevalence fields in view. Browse ingredient records
  • Read how PlainFoodSafe joins source records before treating a screening label as a personal food or health conclusion. Read the methodology

This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.

éMulsifiant — common follow-ups

Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on éMulsifiant?

This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to éMulsifiant, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#6,340 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.

Which product shelves show up most often with éMulsifiant?

éMulsifiant ranks in the top decile by product count (#6,340 of 247,206), appearing in 35 indexed products led by Snacks. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.

Why is éMulsifiant so common on ingredient lists?

The source record does not name a technical effect, yet éMulsifiant appears in 35 products (#6,340 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.

Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (éMulsifiant). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.