Safe

Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement

by Organic Mulberry Tea

Scores 100/100 on FDA SAFFA + CSPI ingredient analysis , with no flagged ingredients identified.

Barcode 8854843000121 · Serving size 1 tea bag (2 g)

The verdict

Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement by Organic Mulberry Tea scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 1 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. Its short parsed label begins Organic Mulberry Leaves, so the useful next step is to inspect those few components directly rather than infer from the composite score. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
flagged ingredients of 1 analyzed
8854843000121
Barcode (UPC/EAN)

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

43000121 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-SHORT 1 ing. REG-SPARSE 0% reg. NOVA-UNK NOVA n/a NUTRI-UNK Nutri n/a RANK-LONG Len top 100% PHOTO-FINISH Brown Rice Noodle · ±0 BOOK-OFF …000121 · July 2026

Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement screens 100/100 with 0 flagged of 1 parsed ingredients. None of the 1 parsed ingredients appear in FDA SAFFA or CSPI — absence of evidence, not a clean bill. Derived index from public OFF + FDA SAFFA + CSPI data — not an official FDA rating; see methodology. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Brown Rice Noodle (0 pts).

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

No Nutri-Score grade is present for this record in the OpenFoodFacts snapshot this page is built from. The nutritional dimension is absent rather than assessed and withheld: the grade depends on a complete declared nutrition panel, and community-contributed records vary in how much of that panel they carry. Nothing about the missing grade implies anything either way about the panel itself. The screen below covers additive ratings only and does not depend on the nutrition figures.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea…100/1002. Brown Rice Noodle100/1003. Prosciutto spread100/1004. Prosciutto Americano100/1005. Alfredo sauce100/100
Nearest cross-brand products by ingredient screening score for Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement (100/100 here).
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea …
100/100
Brown Rice Noodle
100/100
Prosciutto spread
100/100
Prosciutto Americano
100/100
Alfredo sauce
100/100

Ingredient-list length vs every product we publish

Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement lists 1 ingredient on its label

1 0th percentile a longer ingredient list than 0% of the 359,392 products we track

0–2: 6,017 products (2%). This entry sits in this band. 2–4: 24,515 products (7%). Above this entry. 4–6: 30,975 products (9%). Above this entry. 6–8: 30,947 products (9%). Above this entry. 8–10: 31,570 products (9%). Above this entry. 10–12: 29,866 products (8%). Above this entry. 12–14: 28,397 products (8%). Above this entry. 14–16: 27,399 products (8%). Above this entry. 16–18: 24,531 products (7%). Above this entry. 18–20: 19,104 products (5%). Above this entry. 20–22: 14,716 products (4%). Above this entry. 22–24: 12,256 products (3%). Above this entry. 24–26: 10,853 products (3%). Above this entry. 26–28: 9,356 products (3%). Above this entry. 28–30: 7,948 products (2%). Above this entry. 30–32: 6,771 products (2%). Above this entry. 32–34: 5,945 products (2%). Above this entry. 34–36: 5,283 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 4,549 products (1%). Above this entry. 38–40: 4,084 products (1%). Above this entry. 40–42: 24,310 products (7%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

359,392 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 1 (0th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
6,017 products (2%)
2–4
24,515 products (7%)
4–6
30,975 products (9%)
6–8
30,947 products (9%)
8–10
31,570 products (9%)
10–12
29,866 products (8%)
12–14
28,397 products (8%)
14–16
27,399 products (8%)
16–18
24,531 products (7%)
18–20
19,104 products (5%)
20–22
14,716 products (4%)
22–24
12,256 products (3%)
24–26
10,853 products (3%)
26–28
9,356 products (3%)
28–30
7,948 products (2%)
30–32
6,771 products (2%)
32–34
5,945 products (2%)
34–36
5,283 products (1%)
36–38
4,549 products (1%)
38–40
4,084 products (1%)
40 and above
24,310 products (7%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. No category with enough published products was available for this record, so the comparison runs against the whole published catalogue.

Ingredient Safety Analysis

Full Ingredient List

Organic mulberry leaves

Data Sources

Data as of July 2026. Source: OpenFoodFacts, FDA SAFFA, CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

Product data from OpenFoodFacts (ODbL). Ingredient safety ratings from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine. See our methodology for details.

This information is for reference only and does not constitute dietary or medical advice.

Cross-brand products with similar screening profiles

Two PlainFoodSafe-derived peer sets for Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement, both outside the Organic Mulberry Tea brand so the neighborhoods are not catalog containment (the More-from block above stays brand-local).

Product data from Open Food Facts; additive safety from the FDA SAFFA inventory and CSPI Chemical Cuisine. See our methodology for details. Compiled by PlainFoodSafe

Every figure on PlainFoodSafe is rendered directly from OpenFoodFacts and FDA data, no number is typed in by an editor. Product figures are computed directly from OpenFoodFacts, FDA SAFFA, and CSPI Chemical Cuisine data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.

Share card for Sugar Balancer Herbal Tea Dietary Supplement Food Ingredient Profile

Share this food data

Download this sourced data card or share the canonical profile.