Safe

Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water

by Bumble Bee

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0086600403304 · Bumble Bee · Canned foods. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0086600403304 · Serving size 1 serving (85 g)

The verdict

Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water by Bumble Bee scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 7 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. This is a focused 7-component label led by White Chicken, Water, Seasoning; compare those leading ingredients with the product's processing and nutrition fields before deciding whether it fits your goal. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 7 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
A
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

78/100

Grade B+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

A

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

00403304 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-FOCUSED 7 ing. REG-SPARSE 14% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-A Nutri-A RANK-LONG Len top 92% LEAD-FLAG Salt PHOTO-FINISH Ho Ho Kisses, · ±0 BOOK-OFF …403304 · July 2026

1 of 7 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Salt). Source sheet 00403304 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Ho Ho Kisses, Candy Cane · Nearest score peer is Ho Ho Kisses, Candy Cane at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

Nutri-Score placed this label in its highest band. The model reaches that grade when the credit side of its ledger — fibre, protein and the fruit, vegetable and legume fraction — outweighs the energy, sugar, saturated-fat and sodium it counts against a product. The scale is computed per hundred grams from the declared nutrition panel, which is why two products with similar ingredients can grade differently on portion-heavy categories. It is a nutritional summary only, calculated independently of the additive registries screened further down this page, and it neither incorporates nor contradicts them.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Premium Chunk White Chick…100/1002. Ho Ho Kisses, Candy Cane: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Ho Ho Kisses, Candy Cane100/1003. Wild Selections, Sardine Fillets In Zesty Mango Sauce: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Wild Selections, Sardine …100/1004. Wild Selections, Lightly Smoked Sardine Fillets: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Wild Selections, Lightly …100/1005. Wild Selections, Smoke Flavored Salmon Fillets In Olive Oil: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Wild Selections, Smoke Fl…100/100
High-band neighbours for Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water (100/100) outside Bumble Bee.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water
100/100
Ho Ho Kisses, Candy Cane
100/100
Wild Selections, Sardine Fillets In Zesty Mango Sauce
100/100
Wild Selections, Lightly Smoked Sardine Fillets
100/100
Wild Selections, Smoke Flavored Salmon Fillets In Olive Oil
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 13,350 products we've scored in the Meats and their products category, the average safety score is 92.4/100. Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water scores 7.6 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 92.4/100), so it is a comparatively strong pick for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Canned foods products

Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water lists 7 ingredients on its label

7 8th percentile a longer ingredient list than 8% of the 2,784 products we track

0–2: 2 products (0%). Below this entry. 2–4: 58 products (2%). Below this entry. 4–6: 123 products (4%). Below this entry. 6–8: 148 products (5%). This entry sits in this band. 8–10: 226 products (8%). Above this entry. 10–12: 301 products (11%). Above this entry. 12–14: 233 products (8%). Above this entry. 14–16: 246 products (9%). Above this entry. 16–18: 182 products (7%). Above this entry. 18–20: 165 products (6%). Above this entry. 20–22: 133 products (5%). Above this entry. 22–24: 133 products (5%). Above this entry. 24–26: 123 products (4%). Above this entry. 26–28: 116 products (4%). Above this entry. 28–30: 124 products (4%). Above this entry. 30–32: 78 products (3%). Above this entry. 32–34: 95 products (3%). Above this entry. 34–36: 65 products (2%). Above this entry. 36–38: 49 products (2%). Above this entry. 38–40: 61 products (2%). Above this entry. 40–42: 123 products (4%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Canned foods product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

2,784 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 7 (8th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
2 products (0%)
2–4
58 products (2%)
4–6
123 products (4%)
6–8
148 products (5%)
8–10
226 products (8%)
10–12
301 products (11%)
12–14
233 products (8%)
14–16
246 products (9%)
16–18
182 products (7%)
18–20
165 products (6%)
20–22
133 products (5%)
22–24
133 products (5%)
24–26
123 products (4%)
26–28
116 products (4%)
28–30
124 products (4%)
30–32
78 products (3%)
32–34
95 products (3%)
34–36
65 products (2%)
36–38
49 products (2%)
38–40
61 products (2%)
40 and above
123 products (4%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 2,784 Canned foods products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

White chicken, water, seasoning (salt, chicken broth and natural flavors), modified food starch, sodium phosphates

Categories

Canned foods Meats and their products Meats Canned meats

High-score cross-brand comparables for Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water

Neighbours outside Bumble Bee with screening scores in the same high band as Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Bumble Bee; these peers cross brands.

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Follow the flagged-label evidence

Salt is the first flagged ingredient selected from Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water's parsed label. Start with that ingredient’s source context, then compare the rest of this 7-ingredient record.

  • Inspect the FDA SAFFA and CSPI context attached to Salt. Open Salt
  • Compare Premium Chunk White Chicken in Water's 0 flagged ingredients with a product from the same score neighbourhood. Compare labels
  • Check how caution flags contribute to the derived screening score before drawing a dietary conclusion. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0086600403304: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.