Rosehips
Rosehips appears in 82 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.
What the data can answer
Rosehips appears in 82 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.
- 82
- catalogued products
- #3,608
- usage rank of 247,206
- 28
- named brands represented
- 36%
- average depth down ingredient lists
Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.
Rosehips: top-decile catalog footprint (#3,608 of 247,206)
- Usage rank
- #3,608
- of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 30 others that also appear in exactly 82 products, listed in more products than 98.5% of them.
- Typical depth in an ingredient list
- 36%
- Mean relative depth 36% across 82 parsed labels, slot 5.2 on average. Rosehips tends to sit in the upper half of the list. Depth is location on the label, not a measured dose.
Computed from parsed product ingredient lists (Open Food Facts). The ranking covers 247,206 ingredients that appear at least once. Neither usage rank nor label depth is a safety clearance.
Reading this ingredient record
A clean co-occurrence count is not a safety clearance
No linked product currently contains a separately flagged ingredient, but zero co-occurrence is an absence-of-evidence result, not regulatory approval. The practical reading is about use: Rosehips reaches 28 named brands, most often appears under Plant-based foods and beverages, and typically sits in the upper half of the list. Product examples include 100% organic herbal tea; Angel Brand, Ginger Sip Tea; Berry fusion. Check the current label and authoritative source databases when the decision involves allergies, dosage, pregnancy, or a medical condition.
0% of linked products currently carry a separately flagged ingredient
Most NOVA-tagged examples land in Group 4 (45 of 79), yet the products span unrelated categories. That contrast matters: processing class can describe how a food was made while saying nothing decisive about this ingredient's regulatory status. Use the linked examples to understand formulation context, and leave the unanswered toxicology or individual-sensitivity question unanswered.
Next check: verify the unresolved source rating directly instead of converting zero co-flags into reassurance.
How do the sampled products compare?
Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.
Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Rosehips
Products Containing Rosehips
A sample of 16 high-volume listings among the 82 indexed products containing Rosehips:
Peer ingredients with comparable catalog mass (near “Added Color”)
Top-decile company for Rosehips: 82 listings averaging 100/100. Comparable product-count neighbours: Added Color · Ammonium Phosphate · Arôme Naturel.
Similar product count
Nearest other ingredients by Open Food Facts product count (floored at ≥50).
Similar mean product score
Score-axis peers only, mean screening score among ingredients with ≥50 scored products, not a second count list.
Next steps from the Rosehips page
Start from Rosehips's 82 catalogued appearances and the attached source fields, then open the product rows that match your use case.
- Open the product sample for Rosehips and read how the term sits on real packages. See listed products
- Place Rosehips next to “Ammonium Phosphate” (or another peer) using the same FDA/CSPI and prevalence fields. Open a peer record
- Check the methodology for how FDA SAFFA, CSPI, and Open Food Facts rows are joined on this site. Read the methodology
This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Rosehips? ▼
This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Rosehips, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#3,608 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.
Which product shelves show up most often with Rosehips? ▼
Rosehips ranks in the top decile by product count (#3,608 of 247,206), appearing in 82 indexed products led by Plant-based foods and beverages. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.
Why is Rosehips so common on ingredient lists? ▼
The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Rosehips appears in 82 products (#3,608 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.
Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Rosehips). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.