Ricinus Communis

Ricinus Communis appears in 24 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.

What the data can answer

Ricinus Communis appears in 24 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.

24
catalogued products
#8,251
usage rank of 247,206
13
named brands represented
26%
average depth down ingredient lists

Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.

Ricinus Communis sits in the busiest tenth of the catalog (#8,251 / 247,206)

Usage rank
#8,251
of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 260 others that also appear in exactly 24 products.
Typical depth in an ingredient list
26%
Mean relative depth 26% across 24 parsed labels, slot 9.1 on average. Ricinus Communis tends to sit in the upper half of the list. Depth is location on the label, not a measured dose.

Ranks use Open Food Facts ingredient rows on this site’s refresh cycle. 247,206 ingredients with ≥1 product appearance enter the ranking. Prevalence and list depth are catalog facts, not toxicology.

What this page can and cannot answer

Use prevalence before concern

Only 8.3% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Ricinus Communis spans 13 named brands and is led by the Sunscreen group. Start with 5-in-1 Wonder Spray; Baby mineral sunscreen stick; calm face and body lotion when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 99.2/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.

13 named brands carry this ingredient

The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 18 of 20 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.

Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.

How do the sampled products compare?

Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.

Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Ricinus Communis

Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 16 entities by Safety score (X) and Flagged ingredients on label (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High score, still flaggedLow score, more flaggedHigh score, fewer flaggedLow score, fewer flagged 99.9100.0100.0100100.0100.0100.1 00.00.00.1 Safety score Flagged ingredients on label Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Ricinus Communis
Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

Ricinus Communis vs other top-decile catalog footprints

Ricinus Communis sits among other busy catalog rows (24 products, mean score 99.2/100). Count peers and score peers are listed separately on purpose.

Similar mean product score

Nearest other ingredients by mean product screening score (floored at ≥50 scored products), distinct from the count row.

Next steps from the Ricinus Communis page

Use the 24-product footprint and source labels as a starting point, then inspect the records most relevant to your question.

  • Review the sampled product records that list Ricinus Communis to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. See listed products
  • Compare another ingredient’s source-backed rating, FDA status, and product footprint. Browse ingredient records
  • See the join rules behind screening scores before reading them as dietary advice. See source joins

This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Ricinus Communis?

This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Ricinus Communis, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#8,251 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.

Which product shelves show up most often with Ricinus Communis?

Ricinus Communis ranks in the top decile by product count (#8,251 of 247,206), appearing in 24 indexed products led by Sunscreen. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.

Why is Ricinus Communis so common on ingredient lists?

The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Ricinus Communis appears in 24 products (#8,251 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.

Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Ricinus Communis). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.