Pork Rinds
Pork Rinds appears in 112 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.
What the data can answer
Pork Rinds appears in 112 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.
- 112
- catalogued products
- #2,903
- usage rank of 247,206
- 35
- named brands represented
- 1%
- average depth down ingredient lists
Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.
High-volume listing for Pork Rinds - usage rank #2,903
- Usage rank
- #2,903
- of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 13 others that also appear in exactly 112 products, listed in more products than 98.8% of them.
- Typical depth in an ingredient list
- 1%
- Averaged label depth puts Pork Rinds near the top of the captured list (1% of list length, mean slot 1.1). Compound ingredients and OCR noise mean this cannot stand in for quantity.
Ranks use Open Food Facts ingredient rows on this site’s refresh cycle. 247,206 ingredients with ≥1 product appearance enter the ranking. Prevalence and list depth are catalog facts, not toxicology.
How to use this page
Use prevalence before concern
Only 15.2% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Pork Rinds spans 35 named brands and is led by the Snacks group. Start with Bar-b-que flavored pork rinds; Bar-B-Que Microwave Pork Rinds; Barbecue chicarrones when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 94.8/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.
35 named brands carry this ingredient
The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 85 of 109 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.
Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.
What else is usually in the same product as Pork Rinds
Across the 112 products on this site that list Pork Rinds, these flagged additives appear alongside it most often. The comparison column is how often each one appears across every product with a parsed ingredient list, so the two figures are measured over the same set. Red 40 shows up about 2.3x more often with Pork Rinds than in the catalogue at large.
| Additive | Shared products | Share of Pork Rinds products | Share of all products |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red 40 | 14 | 12.5% | 5.4% |
| Caramel Coloring | 13 | 11.6% | 5.7% |
| Yellow 6 | 5 | 4.5% | 3.4% |
Co-occurrence describes what manufacturers formulate together. It is not a claim that these additives interact, and it carries no regulatory meaning. Counted over products with parsed ingredient lists; Open Food Facts, 2026-09-01.
How do the sampled products compare?
Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.
Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Pork Rinds
Products Containing Pork Rinds
16 busy labels from the 112 indexed products that list Pork Rinds:
Pork Rinds vs other top-decile catalog footprints
High-volume peers for Pork Rinds: 112 products, mean screening score 94.8/100. Comparable product-count neighbours: Chili Pepper And Other Spices · Expeller Pressed Vegetable Oil · Flaxseed Oil. Axes below stay distinct so count-neighbors do not duplicate score-neighbors.
Similar product count
Nearest other ingredients by Open Food Facts product count (floored at ≥50).
Similar mean product score
Score-axis peers only, mean screening score among ingredients with ≥50 scored products, not a second count list.
What to do with this Pork Rinds record
112 product rows plus any FDA/CSPI fields on Pork Rinds are the evidence base — drill into the listings that matter for your decision.
- Review the sampled product records that list Pork Rinds to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. Open product sample
- Move to a second ingredient page and compare registry fields plus catalog mass side by side. Open a peer record
- Check the methodology for how FDA SAFFA, CSPI, and Open Food Facts rows are joined on this site. See source joins
This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.
Pork Rinds — common follow-ups
Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Pork Rinds? ▼
This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Pork Rinds, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#2,903 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.
Which product shelves show up most often with Pork Rinds? ▼
Pork Rinds ranks in the top decile by product count (#2,903 of 247,206), appearing in 112 indexed products led by Snacks. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.
Why is Pork Rinds so common on ingredient lists? ▼
The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Pork Rinds appears in 112 products (#2,903 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.
Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Pork Rinds). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.