Live Culture

Live Culture appears in 20 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.

What the data can answer

Live Culture appears in 20 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.

20
catalogued products
#9,371
usage rank of 247,206
5
named brands represented
70%
average depth down ingredient lists

Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.

Live Culture sits in the busiest tenth of the catalog (#9,371 / 247,206)

Usage rank
#9,371
of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 358 others that also appear in exactly 20 products.
Typical depth in an ingredient list
70%
Mean relative depth 70% across 20 parsed labels, slot 8.7 on average. Live Culture tends to sit in the lower half of the list. Depth is location on the label, not a measured dose.

Computed from parsed product ingredient lists (Open Food Facts). The ranking covers 247,206 ingredients that appear at least once. Neither usage rank nor label depth is a safety clearance.

Reading this ingredient record

Use prevalence before concern

Only 15% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Live Culture spans 5 named brands and is led by the Beverages group. Start with 100% Grass-Fed A2/Organic Lowfat Yogurt; Blaclk Tea; Kombucha starter kit when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 94.0/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.

5 named brands carry this ingredient

The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 12 of 18 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.

Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.

How do the sampled products compare?

Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.

Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Live Culture

Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 16 entities by Safety score (X) and Flagged ingredients on label (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High score, still flaggedLow score, more flaggedHigh score, fewer flaggedLow score, fewer flagged 050100150 02468 Safety score Flagged ingredients on label Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Live Culture
Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

High-volume peers for Live Culture

High-volume peers for Live Culture: 20 products, mean screening score 94/100. Axes below stay distinct so count-neighbors do not duplicate score-neighbors.

Similar mean product score

Nearest other ingredients by mean product screening score (floored at ≥50 scored products), distinct from the count row.

Using the Live Culture evidence

Start from Live Culture's 20 catalogued appearances and the attached source fields, then open the product rows that match your use case.

  • Review the sampled product records that list Live Culture to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. See listed products
  • Compare another ingredient’s source-backed rating, FDA status, and product footprint. Open a peer record
  • Check the methodology for how FDA SAFFA, CSPI, and Open Food Facts rows are joined on this site. Read the methodology

This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.

Questions readers ask about Live Culture

Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Live Culture?

This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Live Culture, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#9,371 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.

Which product shelves show up most often with Live Culture?

Live Culture ranks in the top decile by product count (#9,371 of 247,206), appearing in 20 indexed products led by Beverages. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.

Why is Live Culture so common on ingredient lists?

The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Live Culture appears in 20 products (#9,371 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.

Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Live Culture). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.