Dried Hibiscus
Dried Hibiscus appears in 306 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.
What the data can answer
Dried Hibiscus appears in 306 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.
- 306
- catalogued products
- #1,474
- usage rank of 247,206
- 113
- named brands represented
- 43%
- average depth down ingredient lists
Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.
Dried Hibiscus: top-decile catalog footprint (#1,474 of 247,206)
- Usage rank
- #1,474
- of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 5 others that also appear in exactly 306 products, listed in more products than 99.4% of them.
- Typical depth in an ingredient list
- 43%
- Averaged label depth puts Dried Hibiscus in the upper half of the list (43% of list length, mean slot 6.7). Compound ingredients and OCR noise mean this cannot stand in for quantity.
Ranks use Open Food Facts ingredient rows on this site’s refresh cycle. 247,206 ingredients with ≥1 product appearance enter the ranking. Prevalence and list depth are catalog facts, not toxicology.
Reading this ingredient record
Use prevalence before concern
Only 3.3% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Dried Hibiscus spans 113 named brands and is led by the Plant-based foods and beverages group. Start with A premium craft cocktail mixer; Alive Yerba Mate & Citrus Carbonated Tea; Alphabet Fruit Snacks when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 99.4/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.
113 named brands carry this ingredient
The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 199 of 288 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.
Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.
What else is usually in the same product as Dried Hibiscus
Across the 306 products on this site that list Dried Hibiscus, these flagged additives appear alongside it most often. The comparison column is how often each one appears across every product with a parsed ingredient list, so the two figures are measured over the same set.
| Additive | Shared products | Share of Dried Hibiscus products | Share of all products |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sucralose | 8 | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Co-occurrence describes what manufacturers formulate together. It is not a claim that these additives interact, and it carries no regulatory meaning. Counted over products with parsed ingredient lists; Open Food Facts, 2026-09-01.
How do the sampled products compare?
Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.
Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Dried Hibiscus
Products Containing Dried Hibiscus
16 busy labels from the 306 indexed products that list Dried Hibiscus:
Dried Hibiscus vs other top-decile catalog footprints
High-volume peers for Dried Hibiscus: 306 products, mean screening score 99.4/100. Catalog-mass neighbours in view: Cooked Brown Rice; Cultured Pasteurized Grade A Low Fat Milk; Diced Pears. Axes below stay distinct so count-neighbors do not duplicate score-neighbors.
Similar product count
Nearest other ingredients by Open Food Facts product count (floored at ≥50).
Similar mean product score
Mean product-score neighbours (≥50 scored products), kept separate from the product-count peers above.
What to do with this Dried Hibiscus record
306 product rows plus any FDA/CSPI fields on Dried Hibiscus are the evidence base — drill into the listings that matter for your decision.
- Open the product sample for Dried Hibiscus and read how the term sits on real packages. See listed products
- Move to a second ingredient page and compare registry fields plus catalog mass side by side. Compare a peer
- Check the methodology for how FDA SAFFA, CSPI, and Open Food Facts rows are joined on this site. Open methodology
This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Dried Hibiscus? ▼
This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Dried Hibiscus, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#1,474 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.
Which product shelves show up most often with Dried Hibiscus? ▼
Dried Hibiscus ranks in the top decile by product count (#1,474 of 247,206), appearing in 306 indexed products led by Plant-based foods and beverages. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.
Why is Dried Hibiscus so common on ingredient lists? ▼
The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Dried Hibiscus appears in 306 products (#1,474 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.
Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Dried Hibiscus). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.