Safe

Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags

by Podravka

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0842826000006 · Podravka · Plant-based foods and beverages. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0842826000006 · Serving size 1 cup (240 ml)

The verdict

Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags by Podravka scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 1 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. Its short parsed label begins Rose Hip Berries 75% Hibiscus Flower 25%, so the useful next step is to inspect those few components directly rather than infer from the composite score. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 1 analyzed
B
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

93/100

Grade A+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

N/A

NOVA food-processing classification

Nutrition Grade

B

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

26000006 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-SHORT 1 ing. REG-SPARSE 0% reg. NOVA-UNK NOVA n/a NUTRI-B Nutri-B RANK-LONG Len top 100% PHOTO-FINISH Chocolino, Instant Cereal · ±0 BOOK-OFF …000006 · July 2026

None of the 1 parsed ingredients appear in FDA SAFFA or CSPI — absence of evidence, not a clean bill. Source sheet 26000006 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Chocolino, Instant Cereal Flakes With Sweet Chocolate · Nearest score peer is Chocolino, Instant Cereal Flakes With Sweet Chocolate at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

The Nutri-Score algorithm returned its second band for this label. That grade typically describes a nutrition panel whose favourable components register clearly in the model without fully offsetting its energy or sodium terms. Because the calculation is a single points balance rather than a set of independent thresholds, a strong fibre or protein figure can lift a panel into this band even where one penalised nutrient sits high. The grade summarises the declared panel alone and carries no information about the additive ratings screened below.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Rose Hip With Hibiscus Fl…100/1002. Chocolino, Instant Cereal Flakes With Sweet Chocolate: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Chocolino, Instant Cereal…100/1003. Podravka gourmet all purpose seasoning mix mix: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Podravka gourmet all purp…100/1004. Vegeta, all purpose seasoning: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Vegeta, all purpose seaso…100/1005. Lino, Medolino Instant Cereal Flakes With Honey And Vitamins: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Lino, Medolino Instant Ce…100/100
High-band neighbours for Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags (100/100) outside Podravka.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags
100/100
Chocolino, Instant Cereal Flakes With Sweet Chocolate
100/100
Podravka gourmet all purpose seasoning mix mix
100/100
Vegeta, all purpose seasoning
100/100
Lino, Medolino Instant Cereal Flakes With Honey And Vitamins
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 78,450 products we've scored in the Plant-based foods and beverages category, the average safety score is 97.7/100. Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags scores 2.3 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 97.7/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Plant-based foods and beverages products

Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags lists 1 ingredient on its label

1 0th percentile a longer ingredient list than 0% of the 63,434 products we track

0–2: 3,907 products (6%). This entry sits in this band. 2–4: 7,921 products (12%). Above this entry. 4–6: 8,845 products (14%). Above this entry. 6–8: 7,032 products (11%). Above this entry. 8–10: 6,320 products (10%). Above this entry. 10–12: 4,190 products (7%). Above this entry. 12–14: 3,449 products (5%). Above this entry. 14–16: 3,051 products (5%). Above this entry. 16–18: 2,493 products (4%). Above this entry. 18–20: 2,053 products (3%). Above this entry. 20–22: 1,808 products (3%). Above this entry. 22–24: 1,758 products (3%). Above this entry. 24–26: 1,623 products (3%). Above this entry. 26–28: 1,606 products (3%). Above this entry. 28–30: 1,360 products (2%). Above this entry. 30–32: 1,198 products (2%). Above this entry. 32–34: 1,081 products (2%). Above this entry. 34–36: 901 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 649 products (1%). Above this entry. 38–40: 534 products (1%). Above this entry. 40–42: 1,655 products (3%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Plant-based foods and beverages product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

63,434 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 1 (0th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
3,907 products (6%)
2–4
7,921 products (12%)
4–6
8,845 products (14%)
6–8
7,032 products (11%)
8–10
6,320 products (10%)
10–12
4,190 products (7%)
12–14
3,449 products (5%)
14–16
3,051 products (5%)
16–18
2,493 products (4%)
18–20
2,053 products (3%)
20–22
1,808 products (3%)
22–24
1,758 products (3%)
24–26
1,623 products (3%)
26–28
1,606 products (3%)
28–30
1,360 products (2%)
30–32
1,198 products (2%)
32–34
1,081 products (2%)
34–36
901 products (1%)
36–38
649 products (1%)
38–40
534 products (1%)
40 and above
1,655 products (3%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 63,434 Plant-based foods and beverages products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Rose hip berries 75% hibiscus flower 25%.

Categories

Plant-based foods and beverages Beverages Hot beverages Plant-based beverages Teas Tea bags

High-score cross-brand comparables for Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags

Neighbours outside Podravka with screening scores in the same high band as Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Podravka; these peers cross brands.

Check the compact label closely

Check the compact label closely

Rose Hip With Hibiscus Flower Tea Bags has a shorter ingredient list than 100% of its Plant-based foods and beverages category comparison set. A short list is descriptive, not a safety verdict, so inspect the named ingredients directly.

  • Start with the parsed ingredient profiles and review the source-backed context behind this compact list. Inspect ingredients
  • Compare another barcode with a similarly short ingredient list. Compare labels
  • Check how the screening method treats registry matches and unmatched ingredients. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0842826000006: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.