Safe

Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix

by Force Factor

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0818594019922 · Force Factor · Electrolyte-drink. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0818594019922 · Serving size 1 z prepared (8 g)

The verdict

Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix by Force Factor scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 7 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. This is a focused 7-component label led by Cane Sugar, Citric Acid, Natural Flavors; compare those leading ingredients with the product's processing and nutrition fields before deciding whether it fits your goal. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 7 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
D
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

63/100

Grade C+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

NOVA 4

Ultra-processed foods

Nutrition Grade

D

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

94019922 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-FOCUSED 7 ing. REG-PART 57% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-D Nutri-D RANK-LONG Len top 99% LEAD-RARE Silicon Dioxide PHOTO-FINISH Blood Pressure Support · ±0 BOOK-OFF …019922 · July 2026

4 of 7 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Silicon Dioxide). Source sheet 94019922 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Blood Pressure Support · Nearest score peer is Blood Pressure Support at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

This label falls in the fourth Nutri-Score band. The model arrives there when its penalty terms — energy density, sugars, saturated fat, sodium — carry more weight in the calculation than the fibre, protein and produce content it credits. The band covers a wide span of the points scale, so position within it is not visible from the letter alone. The grade reflects the declared nutrition panel and is unrelated to the additive ratings listed below, which come from different bodies applying different criteria.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Liquid Labs Rapid Hydrati…100/1002. Blood Pressure Support: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Blood Pressure Support100/1003. Pork Lau Lau: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Pork Lau Lau100/1004. Chicken Lau Lau: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Chicken Lau Lau100/1005. Naturally more, crunchy peanut butter: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Naturally more, crunchy p…100/100
High-band neighbours for Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix (100/100) outside Force Factor.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix
100/100
Blood Pressure Support
100/100
Pork Lau Lau
100/100
Chicken Lau Lau
100/100
Naturally more, crunchy peanut butter
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 84 products we've scored in the Electrolyte-drink category, the average safety score is 95.4/100. Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix scores 4.6 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 95.4/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Electrolyte-drink products

Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix lists 7 ingredients on its label

7 1st percentile a longer ingredient list than 1% of the 80 products we track

6–8: 10 products (13%). This entry sits in this band. 8–10: 9 products (11%). Above this entry. 10–12: 10 products (13%). Above this entry. 12–14: 11 products (14%). Above this entry. 14–16: 10 products (13%). Above this entry. 16–18: 5 products (6%). Above this entry. 18–20: 7 products (9%). Above this entry. 20–22: 7 products (9%). Above this entry. 22–24: 3 products (4%). Above this entry. 24–26: 2 products (3%). Above this entry. 26–28: 1 products (1%). Above this entry. 28–30: 1 products (1%). Above this entry. 34–36: 2 products (3%). Above this entry. 40–42: 2 products (3%). Above this entry. This product 6 42 every published Electrolyte-drink product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

80 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 7 (1st percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

6–8
10 products (13%)
8–10
9 products (11%)
10–12
10 products (13%)
12–14
11 products (14%)
14–16
10 products (13%)
16–18
5 products (6%)
18–20
7 products (9%)
20–22
7 products (9%)
22–24
3 products (4%)
24–26
2 products (3%)
26–28
1 products (1%)
28–30
1 products (1%)
34–36
2 products (3%)
40 and above
2 products (3%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 80 Electrolyte-drink products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Cane Sugar, Citric Acid, Natural Flavors, Stevia Leaf Extract, Malic Acid, Maltodextrin, Silicon Dioxide

Categories

Electrolyte-drink

High-score cross-brand comparables for Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix

Neighbours outside Force Factor with screening scores in the same high band as Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Force Factor; these peers cross brands.

Check the compact label closely

Check the compact label closely

Liquid Labs Rapid Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix has a shorter ingredient list than 99% of its Electrolyte-drink category comparison set. A short list is descriptive, not a safety verdict, so inspect the named ingredients directly.

  • Start with Silicon Dioxide and review the source-backed context behind this compact list. Inspect ingredients
  • Compare another barcode with a similarly short ingredient list. Compare labels
  • Check how the screening method treats registry matches and unmatched ingredients. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0818594019922: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.