Safe

Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice

by Eight Wonder

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0683855040171 · Eight Wonder · Plant-based foods and beverages. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0683855040171 · Serving size 0.25 cup (45 g)

The verdict

Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice by Eight Wonder scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 8 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. This is a focused 8-component label led by In The Municipalites Of Nationin, Barlig, Tadian; compare those leading ingredients with the product's processing and nutrition fields before deciding whether it fits your goal. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 8 analyzed
B
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

93/100

Grade A+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

N/A

NOVA food-processing classification

Nutrition Grade

B

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

55040171 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-FOCUSED 8 ing. REG-SPARSE 0% reg. NOVA-UNK NOVA n/a NUTRI-B Nutri-B RANK-LONG Len top 56% PHOTO-FINISH Timeless Natural Food, · ±0 BOOK-OFF …040171 · July 2026

None of the 8 parsed ingredients appear in FDA SAFFA or CSPI — absence of evidence, not a clean bill. Source sheet 55040171 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Timeless Natural Food, 100% Organic Yellow Split Peas · Nearest score peer is Timeless Natural Food, 100% Organic Yellow Split Peas at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

The Nutri-Score algorithm returned its second band for this label. That grade typically describes a nutrition panel whose favourable components register clearly in the model without fully offsetting its energy or sodium terms. Because the calculation is a single points balance rather than a set of independent thresholds, a strong fibre or protein figure can lift a panel into this band even where one penalised nutrient sits high. The grade summarises the declared panel alone and carries no information about the additive ratings screened below.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Eight wonder, mountain vi…100/1002. Timeless Natural Food, 100% Organic Yellow Split Peas: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Timeless Natural Food, 10…100/1003. Timeless Natural Food, Green Lentils: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Timeless Natural Food, Gr…100/1004. Apple Cider: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Apple Cider100/1005. Flat Iron Steak: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Flat Iron Steak100/100
High-band neighbours for Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice (100/100) outside Eight Wonder.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice
100/100
Timeless Natural Food, 100% Organic Yellow Split Peas
100/100
Timeless Natural Food, Green Lentils
100/100
Apple Cider
100/100
Flat Iron Steak
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 78,450 products we've scored in the Plant-based foods and beverages category, the average safety score is 97.7/100. Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice scores 2.3 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 97.7/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Plant-based foods and beverages products

Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice lists 8 ingredients on its label

8 44th percentile a longer ingredient list than 44% of the 63,434 products we track

0–2: 3,907 products (6%). Below this entry. 2–4: 7,921 products (12%). Below this entry. 4–6: 8,845 products (14%). Below this entry. 6–8: 7,032 products (11%). Below this entry. 8–10: 6,320 products (10%). This entry sits in this band. 10–12: 4,190 products (7%). Above this entry. 12–14: 3,449 products (5%). Above this entry. 14–16: 3,051 products (5%). Above this entry. 16–18: 2,493 products (4%). Above this entry. 18–20: 2,053 products (3%). Above this entry. 20–22: 1,808 products (3%). Above this entry. 22–24: 1,758 products (3%). Above this entry. 24–26: 1,623 products (3%). Above this entry. 26–28: 1,606 products (3%). Above this entry. 28–30: 1,360 products (2%). Above this entry. 30–32: 1,198 products (2%). Above this entry. 32–34: 1,081 products (2%). Above this entry. 34–36: 901 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 649 products (1%). Above this entry. 38–40: 534 products (1%). Above this entry. 40–42: 1,655 products (3%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Plant-based foods and beverages product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

63,434 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 8 (44th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
3,907 products (6%)
2–4
7,921 products (12%)
4–6
8,845 products (14%)
6–8
7,032 products (11%)
8–10
6,320 products (10%)
10–12
4,190 products (7%)
12–14
3,449 products (5%)
14–16
3,051 products (5%)
16–18
2,493 products (4%)
18–20
2,053 products (3%)
20–22
1,808 products (3%)
22–24
1,758 products (3%)
24–26
1,623 products (3%)
26–28
1,606 products (3%)
28–30
1,360 products (2%)
30–32
1,198 products (2%)
32–34
1,081 products (2%)
34–36
901 products (1%)
36–38
649 products (1%)
38–40
534 products (1%)
40 and above
1,655 products (3%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 63,434 Plant-based foods and beverages products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

In the municipalites of nationin, barlig, tadian, sadanga, sagada, sabangan, bontoc and besao, mountain province

Categories

Plant-based foods and beverages Plant-based foods Cereals and potatoes Seeds Cereals and their products Cereal grains Rices

High-score cross-brand comparables for Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice

Neighbours outside Eight Wonder with screening scores in the same high band as Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice (100/100 here). No other Eight Wonder products are linked from this barcode; these peers compare across brands only.

Trace this label’s coverage

Trace this label’s coverage

0 of 8 parsed ingredients on Eight wonder, mountain violet sticky rice match at least one source registry. Use the ingredient records to see which entries carry source context and which remain unmatched.

  • Review the ingredient profiles as the most distinctive source-covered entry on this label. Inspect ingredients
  • Compare this product with a nearby cross-brand screening score. Compare labels
  • Read the methodology before treating source coverage as a food, medical, or dietary conclusion. Read the boundary

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0683855040171: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.