Safe

Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea

by Sweet Green

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0636046702969 · Sweet Green · Beverages and beverages preparations. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0636046702969 · Serving size 16oz

The verdict

Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea by Sweet Green scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 7 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. This is a focused 7-component label led by Organic Brewed Infusion, Water, Jasmine Green Tea; compare those leading ingredients with the product's processing and nutrition fields before deciding whether it fits your goal. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 7 analyzed
B
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

93/100

Grade A+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

N/A

NOVA food-processing classification

Nutrition Grade

B

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

46702969 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-FOCUSED 7 ing. REG-SPARSE 0% reg. NOVA-UNK NOVA n/a NUTRI-B Nutri-B RANK-LONG Len top 73% PHOTO-FINISH HT blood orange · ±0 BOOK-OFF …702969 · July 2026

None of the 7 parsed ingredients appear in FDA SAFFA or CSPI — absence of evidence, not a clean bill. Source sheet 46702969 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: HT blood orange tea · Nearest score peer is HT blood orange tea at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

The Nutri-Score algorithm returned its second band for this label. That grade typically describes a nutrition panel whose favourable components register clearly in the model without fully offsetting its energy or sodium terms. Because the calculation is a single points balance rather than a set of independent thresholds, a strong fibre or protein figure can lift a panel into this band even where one penalised nutrient sits high. The grade summarises the declared panel alone and carries no information about the additive ratings screened below.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea100/1002. HT blood orange tea: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. HT blood orange tea100/1003. Harney & Sons Organic Lemonade: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Harney & Sons Organic Lem…100/1004. Organic Supreme Green Unsweetened Iced Tea: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Organic Supreme Green Uns…100/1005. Organic orange mango: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Organic orange mango100/100
High-band neighbours for Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea (100/100) outside Sweet Green.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea
100/100
HT blood orange tea
100/100
Harney & Sons Organic Lemonade
100/100
Organic Supreme Green Unsweetened Iced Tea
100/100
Organic orange mango
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 78,450 products we've scored in the Plant-based foods and beverages category, the average safety score is 97.7/100. Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea scores 2.3 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 97.7/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Beverages and beverages preparations products

Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea lists 7 ingredients on its label

7 27th percentile a longer ingredient list than 27% of the 4,874 products we track

0–2: 103 products (2%). Below this entry. 2–4: 484 products (10%). Below this entry. 4–6: 475 products (10%). Below this entry. 6–8: 550 products (11%). This entry sits in this band. 8–10: 619 products (13%). Above this entry. 10–12: 595 products (12%). Above this entry. 12–14: 493 products (10%). Above this entry. 14–16: 381 products (8%). Above this entry. 16–18: 272 products (6%). Above this entry. 18–20: 193 products (4%). Above this entry. 20–22: 187 products (4%). Above this entry. 22–24: 134 products (3%). Above this entry. 24–26: 95 products (2%). Above this entry. 26–28: 69 products (1%). Above this entry. 28–30: 56 products (1%). Above this entry. 30–32: 38 products (1%). Above this entry. 32–34: 16 products (0%). Above this entry. 34–36: 22 products (0%). Above this entry. 36–38: 5 products (0%). Above this entry. 38–40: 7 products (0%). Above this entry. 40–42: 80 products (2%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Beverages and beverages preparations product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

4,874 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 7 (27th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
103 products (2%)
2–4
484 products (10%)
4–6
475 products (10%)
6–8
550 products (11%)
8–10
619 products (13%)
10–12
595 products (12%)
12–14
493 products (10%)
14–16
381 products (8%)
16–18
272 products (6%)
18–20
193 products (4%)
20–22
187 products (4%)
22–24
134 products (3%)
24–26
95 products (2%)
26–28
69 products (1%)
28–30
56 products (1%)
30–32
38 products (1%)
32–34
16 products (0%)
34–36
22 products (0%)
36–38
5 products (0%)
38–40
7 products (0%)
40 and above
80 products (2%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 4,874 Beverages and beverages preparations products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Organic Brewed Infusion (water, Organic Jasmine Green Tea, Organic yaupon, Organic Soba) Citric Acid for freshness), Pink Himalayan Salt

Categories

Beverages and beverages preparations Plant-based foods and beverages Beverages Hot beverages Plant-based beverages Teas Tea-based beverages Iced teas

High-score cross-brand comparables for Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea

Neighbours outside Sweet Green with screening scores in the same high band as Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea (100/100 here). The 1 same-brand link above stay within Sweet Green; these peers cross brands.

Check the compact label closely

Check the compact label closely

Organic Hibiscus Berry Tea has a shorter ingredient list than 73% of its Beverages and beverages preparations category comparison set. A short list is descriptive, not a safety verdict, so inspect the named ingredients directly.

  • Start with the parsed ingredient profiles and review the source-backed context behind this compact list. Inspect ingredients
  • Compare another barcode with a similarly short ingredient list. Compare labels
  • Check how the screening method treats registry matches and unmatched ingredients. Read the method

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0636046702969: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.