Safe

Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean

by Current's Tackle

Open Food Facts label for barcode 0091037750167 · Current's Tackle · Meats and their products. Screening numbers and flags live in the verdict band below. This hero only situates the source record.

Barcode 0091037750167 · Serving size 4 ONZ (113 g)

The verdict

Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean by Current's Tackle scores 100/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 4 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 0 ingredients are flagged for caution. Its short parsed label begins Non-gmo Black Beans, Rhizophus Culture, Lactic Acid, so the useful next step is to inspect those few components directly rather than infer from the composite score. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

100/100
Safe safety score
0
None flagged · of 4 analyzed
A
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

Composite profile score

One verdict from three independent sources

100/100

Grade A+

Ingredient Safety

100/100

FDA/CSPI flagged-ingredient screening

Processing Level

N/A

NOVA food-processing classification

Nutrition Grade

A

Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition grade

Weighted 50% ingredient safety / 25% processing level / 25% nutrition grade. A dimension with no data for this product (common: source coverage is partial) is dropped and its weight redistributes across the remaining dimensions, so missing data never silently lowers the score. See the full benchmark table.

37750167 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 100/100 FLAG-CLEAN 0 flagged LEN-SHORT 4 ing. REG-SPARSE 25% reg. NOVA-UNK NOVA n/a NUTRI-A Nutri-A RANK-LONG Len top 95% LEAD-RARE Lactic Acid PHOTO-FINISH Banana Rat Wing · ±0 BOOK-OFF …750167 · July 2026

1 of 4 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Lactic Acid). Source sheet 37750167 · Open Food Facts · July 2026. The screening score and flag counts are in the verdict band above. This desk is the provenance stamp, not a second scorecard. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Banana Rat Wing Sauce · Nearest score peer is Banana Rat Wing Sauce at the same screening score.

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

Nutri-Score placed this label in its highest band. The model reaches that grade when the credit side of its ledger — fibre, protein and the fruit, vegetable and legume fraction — outweighs the energy, sugar, saturated-fat and sodium it counts against a product. The scale is computed per hundred grams from the declared nutrition panel, which is why two products with similar ingredients can grade differently on portion-heavy categories. It is a nutritional summary only, calculated independently of the additive registries screened further down this page, and it neither incorporates nor contradicts them.

The declared list parsed into a small number of components. On a short list the registry screen covers close to everything the packaging declares, and any single matched component accounts for a correspondingly large share of the composite. Short lists also leave less room for parsing error, since there are fewer separators and qualifiers for the extraction to resolve.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #11. Smiling Hara, Tempeh Blac…100/1002. Banana Rat Wing Sauce: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #22. Banana Rat Wing Sauce100/1003. Wimpy Hot Sauce: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #33. Wimpy Hot Sauce100/1004. Seasonings with a kick!: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #44. Seasonings with a kick!100/1005. Nutrient Infused Water: 100/100 · 100% of the leader · rank #55. Nutrient Infused Water100/100
High-band neighbours for Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean (100/100) outside Current's Tackle.
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean
100/100
Banana Rat Wing Sauce
100/100
Wimpy Hot Sauce
100/100
Seasonings with a kick!
100/100
Nutrient Infused Water
100/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 13,350 products we've scored in the Meats and their products category, the average safety score is 92.4/100. Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean scores 7.6 points above that category average (100/100 vs. 92.4/100), so it is a comparatively strong pick for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Meats and their products products

Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean lists 4 ingredients on its label

4 5th percentile a longer ingredient list than 5% of the 11,159 products we track

0–2: 79 products (1%). Below this entry. 2–4: 430 products (4%). Below this entry. 4–6: 612 products (5%). This entry sits in this band. 6–8: 1,397 products (13%). Above this entry. 8–10: 1,485 products (13%). Above this entry. 10–12: 1,698 products (15%). Above this entry. 12–14: 1,463 products (13%). Above this entry. 14–16: 996 products (9%). Above this entry. 16–18: 734 products (7%). Above this entry. 18–20: 489 products (4%). Above this entry. 20–22: 377 products (3%). Above this entry. 22–24: 277 products (2%). Above this entry. 24–26: 234 products (2%). Above this entry. 26–28: 140 products (1%). Above this entry. 28–30: 145 products (1%). Above this entry. 30–32: 92 products (1%). Above this entry. 32–34: 83 products (1%). Above this entry. 34–36: 66 products (1%). Above this entry. 36–38: 74 products (1%). Above this entry. 38–40: 50 products (0%). Above this entry. 40–42: 238 products (2%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Meats and their products product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

11,159 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 4 (5th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
79 products (1%)
2–4
430 products (4%)
4–6
612 products (5%)
6–8
1,397 products (13%)
8–10
1,485 products (13%)
10–12
1,698 products (15%)
12–14
1,463 products (13%)
14–16
996 products (9%)
16–18
734 products (7%)
18–20
489 products (4%)
20–22
377 products (3%)
22–24
277 products (2%)
24–26
234 products (2%)
26–28
140 products (1%)
28–30
145 products (1%)
30–32
92 products (1%)
32–34
83 products (1%)
34–36
66 products (1%)
36–38
74 products (1%)
38–40
50 products (0%)
40 and above
238 products (2%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 11,159 Meats and their products products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

Organic non-gmo black beans, rhizophus culture, lactic acid (derived from corn).

Other products containing Rhizophus Culture

Rhizophus Culture is the least common ingredient on this label, appearing in 3 products across the catalog. See its safety profile.

Categories

Meats and their products Meats

High-score cross-brand comparables for Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean

Neighbours outside Current's Tackle with screening scores in the same high band as Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean (100/100 here). The 5 same-brand links above stay within Current's Tackle; these peers cross brands.

Same high-band screening score

Nearest cross-brand products by screening score (100/100 here, no caution flags on the parsed list).

Check the compact label closely

Check the compact label closely

Smiling Hara, Tempeh Black Bean has a shorter ingredient list than 95% of its Meats and their products category comparison set. A short list is descriptive, not a safety verdict, so inspect the named ingredients directly.

This page describes published ingredient-list and source coverage. It is not dietary or medical advice.

Barcode 0091037750167: product data from Open Food Facts (July 2026). Screening from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine where attached. Figures are computed from those sources, not editor-typed. Methodology. Reference only, not dietary or medical advice.