Safe

Sugar Cones

by Kroger

Scores 95/100 on FDA SAFFA + CSPI ingredient analysis , with 1 flagged ingredient identified.

Barcode 0011110096548 · Serving size 1 cone (15 g)

The verdict

Sugar Cones by Kroger scores 95/100 in PlainFoodSafe's ingredient screening. We compared its 16 labeled ingredients with FDA SAFFA regulatory records and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings; 1 ingredient is flagged for caution. The 16-component label is layered, beginning with Bleached Enriched Wheat Flour, Wheat Flour, Niacin. Start with any flagged rows, then check the nutrition grade and serving size instead of treating one roll-up score as the whole decision. This is not a recall, allergy, medical, or dietary-safety determination.

95/100
Safe safety score
1
flagged ingredient of 16 analyzed
Group 4
Ultra-processed
D
Nutri-Score nutrition grade

Computed directly from OpenFoodFacts ingredient data cross-referenced with FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine ratings. See our methodology for the scoring formula.

10096548 · Open Food Facts · July 2026

Sugar Cones label screening desk

SCORE-SAFE 95/100 FLAG-ONE 1 flagged LEN-LAYERED 16 ing. REG-PART 44% reg. NOVA-G4 G4 ultra NUTRI-D Nutri-D RANK-MID Len top 43% LEAD-FLAG Caramel Coloring PHOTO-FINISH Worcestershire sauce · ±0 BOOK-OFF …096548 · July 2026

Sugar Cones screens 95/100 with 1 flagged of 16 parsed ingredients. 7 of 16 parsed ingredients carry FDA SAFFA or CSPI coverage (lead: Caramel Coloring). Derived index from public OFF + FDA SAFFA + CSPI data — not an official FDA rating; see methodology. Methodology · Read with nearest score peer: Worcestershire sauce (0 pts).

Screening model notes

How Nutri-Score, NOVA, and list length read this record

Within the four-tier shelf-label framework this site publishes, the composite for this product falls in the highest band. That band is defined by a threshold on the derived score alone: it is where labels land once components carrying caution-or-worse registry ratings contribute little or nothing to the deduction. The band is a summary of what the screened registries return for the components that were parsed, so it inherits their coverage gaps — a component absent from both registries neither raises nor lowers the figure. The threshold and the weighting behind it are set out on the methodology page.

This label falls in the fourth Nutri-Score band. The model arrives there when its penalty terms — energy density, sugars, saturated fat, sodium — carry more weight in the calculation than the fibre, protein and produce content it credits. The band covers a wide span of the points scale, so position within it is not visible from the letter alone. The grade reflects the declared nutrition panel and is unrelated to the additive ratings listed below, which come from different bodies applying different criteria.

A mid-length component list was parsed from this label. There are enough separate entries for the screen to match several independently, while each matched entry still carries visible weight in the resulting index. Lists of this size are the most common shape in the catalogue, which makes the composite here easier to place against comparable products than at either extreme.

Cross-brand screening score neighbourhood

1. Sugar Cones95/1002. Worcestershire sauce95/1003. Denali Extreme Moose Trac…95/1004. Roasted Turkey & Colby Ja…95/1005. Roast Beef & Cheddar Half…95/100
Nearest cross-brand products by ingredient screening score for Sugar Cones (95/100 here).
Chart values as text

Unit: PlainFoodSafe screening score out of 100. Data current as of July 2026.

Sugar Cones
95/100
Worcestershire sauce
95/100
Denali Extreme Moose Track…
95/100
Roasted Turkey & Colby Jac…
95/100
Roast Beef & Cheddar Half …
95/100

How It Compares to Its Category

Among the 1,202 products we've scored in the Null category, the average safety score is 95.1/100. Sugar Cones scores 0.1 points below that category average (95/100 vs. 95.1/100), so it is roughly typical for shoppers screening within that category specifically, rather than against the product catalog as a whole.

Ingredient-list length vs other Null products

Sugar Cones lists 16 ingredients on its label

16 57th percentile a longer ingredient list than 57% of the 1,052 products we track

0–2: 33 products (3%). Below this entry. 2–4: 56 products (5%). Below this entry. 4–6: 51 products (5%). Below this entry. 6–8: 73 products (7%). Below this entry. 8–10: 53 products (5%). Below this entry. 10–12: 113 products (11%). Below this entry. 12–14: 95 products (9%). Below this entry. 14–16: 129 products (12%). Below this entry. 16–18: 192 products (18%). This entry sits in this band. 18–20: 120 products (11%). Above this entry. 20–22: 48 products (5%). Above this entry. 22–24: 12 products (1%). Above this entry. 24–26: 13 products (1%). Above this entry. 26–28: 7 products (1%). Above this entry. 28–30: 10 products (1%). Above this entry. 30–32: 4 products (0%). Above this entry. 32–34: 11 products (1%). Above this entry. 34–36: 5 products (0%). Above this entry. 36–38: 2 products (0%). Above this entry. 38–40: 2 products (0%). Above this entry. 40–42: 23 products (2%). Above this entry. This product 0 42 every published Null product, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more products. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Distribution as text

1,052 products, bucketed in bands of 2. This entry: 16 (57th percentile). Data current as of July 2026.

0–2
33 products (3%)
2–4
56 products (5%)
4–6
51 products (5%)
6–8
73 products (7%)
8–10
53 products (5%)
10–12
113 products (11%)
12–14
95 products (9%)
14–16
129 products (12%)
16–18
192 products (18%)
18–20
120 products (11%)
20–22
48 products (5%)
22–24
12 products (1%)
24–26
13 products (1%)
26–28
7 products (1%)
28–30
10 products (1%)
30–32
4 products (0%)
32–34
11 products (1%)
34–36
5 products (0%)
36–38
2 products (0%)
38–40
2 products (0%)
40 and above
23 products (2%)

Source Open Food Facts, product label ingredient lists · July 2026

Ingredient-list length is a descriptive property of the label, not a safety rating. A longer list is not automatically worse and a shorter one is not automatically better; the count is shown so the label can be placed against a comparable population. The comparison here runs against the 1,052 Null products we publish with a parsed label, not against the whole catalogue, because list length varies far more between categories than within one.

Full Ingredient List

BLEACHED ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), BROWN SUGAR, VEGETABLE OIL SHORTENING (SOYBEAN OIL OR CANOLA OIL, MODIFIED PALM OIL, SOY LECITHIN), OAT FIBER, SALT, CARAMEL COLOR, ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR, SOY LECITHIN.

Categories

Null

Data Sources

Data as of July 2026. Source: OpenFoodFacts, FDA SAFFA, CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

Product data from OpenFoodFacts (ODbL). Ingredient safety ratings from FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine. See our methodology for details.

This information is for reference only and does not constitute dietary or medical advice.

Cross-brand products with similar screening profiles

Two PlainFoodSafe-derived peer sets for Sugar Cones, both outside the Kroger brand so the neighborhoods are not catalog containment (the More-from block above stays brand-local).

Product data from Open Food Facts; additive safety from the FDA SAFFA inventory and CSPI Chemical Cuisine. See our methodology for details. Compiled by PlainFoodSafe

Every figure on PlainFoodSafe is rendered directly from OpenFoodFacts and FDA data, no number is typed in by an editor. Product figures are computed directly from OpenFoodFacts, FDA SAFFA, and CSPI Chemical Cuisine data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.

Share card for Sugar Cones Food Ingredient Profile

Share this food data

Download this sourced data card or share the canonical profile.