Used For Anti-sticking

Used For Anti-sticking appears in 18 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.

What the data can answer

Used For Anti-sticking appears in 18 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.

18
catalogued products
#10,099
usage rank of 247,206
14
named brands represented
100%
average depth down ingredient lists

Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.

What this page can and cannot answer

Audit the co-occurring flags first

83.3% of the linked products contain at least one separately flagged ingredient, making co-occurrence the dominant follow-up question. That figure does not identify Used For Anti-sticking as the trigger. Open records such as Awesome Gummi Blossoms; Bitterman Family Confections, Gummi Butterflies; Dsd merchandisers, gummy butterflies and inspect which ingredient row carries the caution marker. The 72.8/100 product average is therefore a triage signal for this surrounding formulation set, not an ingredient verdict. Its 100% average label depth helps locate the term when checking the package.

83.3% of linked products contain a separately flagged ingredient

Processing is unusually concentrated here: Group 4 accounts for 18 of 18 NOVA-tagged records. That describes the surrounding products, not the substance. For a useful comparison, hold category and processing level constant, then inspect which named component changes alongside the caution flag; otherwise the product mix will confound the ingredient question.

Next check: open the lowest-scoring linked formulation and locate the exact caution-marked component.

High-volume listing for Used For Anti-sticking - usage rank #10,099

Usage rank
#10,099
of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 399 others that also appear in exactly 18 products.
Typical depth in an ingredient list
100%
Averaged label depth puts Used For Anti-sticking near the end of the captured list (100% of list length, mean slot 13.8). Compound ingredients and OCR noise mean this cannot stand in for quantity.

Derived by this site from the ingredient lists of every catalogued product (Open Food Facts), recomputed on each data refresh. 247,206 ingredients have at least one appearance and are ranked here. Usage and list position describe prevalence, not safety.

How do the sampled products compare?

Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.

Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Used For Anti-sticking

Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 16 entities by Safety score (X) and Flagged ingredients on label (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High score, still flaggedLow score, more flaggedHigh score, fewer flaggedLow score, fewer flagged 050100150 012345 Safety score Flagged ingredients on label Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Used For Anti-sticking
Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

Peer ingredients with comparable catalog mass

Used For Anti-sticking sits among other busy catalog rows (18 products, mean score 72.8/100). Count peers and score peers are listed separately on purpose.

Similar mean product score

Nearest other ingredients by mean product screening score (floored at ≥50 scored products), distinct from the count row.

What to do with this Used For Anti-sticking record

18 product rows plus any FDA/CSPI fields on Used For Anti-sticking are the evidence base — drill into the listings that matter for your decision.

  • Review the sampled product records that list Used For Anti-sticking to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. Browse linked labels
  • Move to a second ingredient page and compare registry fields plus catalog mass side by side. Compare a peer
  • See the join rules behind screening scores before reading them as dietary advice. Read the methodology

This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.

Used For Anti-sticking — common follow-ups

How should I read safety signals when Used For Anti-sticking sits in heavily flagged products?

83.3% of linked products contain at least one separately flagged ingredient, so the first task is locating which row carries the caution marker — not assuming Used For Anti-sticking is the trigger. None of that replaces a product-, dose-, allergy-, or person-specific determination.

Which product shelves show up most often with Used For Anti-sticking?

Used For Anti-sticking ranks in the top decile by product count (#10,099 of 247,206), appearing in 18 indexed products led by Snacks. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.

Why is Used For Anti-sticking so common on ingredient lists?

The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Used For Anti-sticking appears in 18 products (#10,099 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.

Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Used For Anti-sticking). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.