Sliced Apples

Sliced Apples appears in 61 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.

What the data can answer

Sliced Apples appears in 61 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.

61
catalogued products
#4,349
usage rank of 247,206
32
named brands represented
2%
average depth down ingredient lists

Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.

High-volume listing for Sliced Apples - usage rank #4,349

Usage rank
#4,349
of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 39 others that also appear in exactly 61 products, listed in more products than 98.2% of them.
Typical depth in an ingredient list
2%
Of the way down the captured list, averaged across the 61 products listing it (mean slot 2.4). Sliced Apples usually falls near the top of the captured list; this position does not measure its amount because source formatting, compound ingredients and labeling exceptions vary.

Ranks use Open Food Facts ingredient rows on this site’s refresh cycle. 247,206 ingredients with ≥1 product appearance enter the ranking. Prevalence and list depth are catalog facts, not toxicology.

How to use this page

Use prevalence before concern

Only 8.2% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Sliced Apples spans 32 named brands and is led by the Cooking helpers group. Start with Apple Cranberry Pi; Apple crumb cobbler; Apple Pie when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 99.5/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.

32 named brands carry this ingredient

The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 59 of 61 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.

Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.

How do the sampled products compare?

Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.

Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Sliced Apples

Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 16 entities by Safety score (X) and Flagged ingredients on label (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High score, still flaggedLow score, more flaggedHigh score, fewer flaggedLow score, fewer flagged 99.9100.0100.0100100.0100.0100.1 00.00.00.1 Safety score Flagged ingredients on label Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Sliced Apples
Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

High-volume peers for Sliced Apples beside “Natural And Artificial Flavours”

High-volume peers for Sliced Apples: 61 products, mean screening score 99.5/100. Catalog-mass neighbours in view: Natural And Artificial Flavours; Basil Leaves; Brazils. Axes below stay distinct so count-neighbors do not duplicate score-neighbors.

Similar product count

Nearest other ingredients by Open Food Facts product count (floored at ≥50).

Similar mean product score

Nearest other ingredients by mean product screening score (floored at ≥50 scored products), distinct from the count row.

What to do with this Sliced Apples record

Start from Sliced Apples's 61 catalogued appearances and the attached source fields, then open the product rows that match your use case.

  • Review the sampled product records that list Sliced Apples to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. Browse linked labels
  • Move to a second ingredient page and compare registry fields plus catalog mass side by side. Compare a peer
  • See the join rules behind screening scores before reading them as dietary advice. Open methodology

This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.

Questions readers ask about Sliced Apples

Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Sliced Apples?

This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Sliced Apples, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#4,349 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.

Which product shelves show up most often with Sliced Apples?

Sliced Apples ranks in the top decile by product count (#4,349 of 247,206), appearing in 61 indexed products led by Cooking helpers. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.

Why is Sliced Apples so common on ingredient lists?

The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Sliced Apples appears in 61 products (#4,349 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.

Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Sliced Apples). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.