Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat
Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat appears in 1 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.
What the data can answer
Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat appears in 1 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.
- 1
- catalogued products
- #71,300
- usage rank of 247,206
- 1
- named brands represented
- 43%
- average depth down ingredient lists
Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.
How to use this page
Audit the co-occurring flags first
100% of the linked products contain at least one separately flagged ingredient, making co-occurrence the dominant follow-up question. That figure does not identify Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat as the trigger. Open records such as ice breakers and inspect which ingredient row carries the caution marker. The 35.0/100 product average is therefore a triage signal for this surrounding formulation set, not an ingredient verdict. Its 43% average label depth helps locate the term when checking the package.
100% of linked products contain a separately flagged ingredient
Processing is unusually concentrated here: Group 4 accounts for 1 of 1 NOVA-tagged records. That describes the surrounding products, not the substance. For a useful comparison, hold category and processing level constant, then inspect which named component changes alongside the caution flag; otherwise the product mix will confound the ingredient question.
Next check: open the lowest-scoring linked formulation and locate the exact caution-marked component.
Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat: above-median product count (beats 71.2% of ranked ingredients)
- Usage rank
- #71,300
- of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 175,906 others that also appear in exactly 1 product.
- Typical depth in an ingredient list
- 43%
- Of the way down the captured list, averaged across the 1 product listing it (mean slot 17.0). Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat usually falls in the upper half of the list; this position does not measure its amount because source formatting, compound ingredients and labeling exceptions vary.
Derived by this site from the ingredient lists of every catalogued product (Open Food Facts), recomputed on each data refresh. 247,206 ingredients have at least one appearance and are ranked here. Usage and list position describe prevalence, not safety.
Products Containing Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat
Every indexed product currently listing Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat (1 total):
Count and score peers around flagged Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat
Co-flag rate 100% makes peer triage useful: Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat covers 1 products (mean 35/100).
Similar mean product score
Score-axis peers only, mean screening score among ingredients with ≥50 scored products, not a second count list.
Next steps from the Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat page
1 product rows plus any FDA/CSPI fields on Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat are the evidence base — drill into the listings that matter for your decision.
- Review the sampled product records that list Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. See listed products
- Browse another ingredient record and keep the same FDA/CSPI and prevalence fields in view. Open a peer record
- Read how PlainFoodSafe joins source records before treating a screening label as a personal food or health conclusion. Read the methodology
This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.
Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat — common follow-ups
How should I read safety signals when Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat sits in heavily flagged products? ▼
100% of linked products contain at least one separately flagged ingredient, so the first task is locating which row carries the caution marker — not assuming Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat is the trigger. None of that replaces a product-, dose-, allergy-, or person-specific determination.
Where does Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat show up across the catalog? ▼
Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat sits above the median for catalog prevalence (1 products, #71,300 of 247,206) across 1 named brands. Category mix varies — use the linked records rather than treating any single shelf as representative.
Why is Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat so common on ingredient lists? ▼
The current source record does not specify a technical effect for Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat. Its in the upper half of the list and product examples are shown without guessing why manufacturers include it.
Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Not A Significant Source Of Calories From Fat). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.