Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar

Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar appears in 40 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.

What the data can answer

Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar appears in 40 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.

40
catalogued products
#5,797
usage rank of 247,206
17
named brands represented
26%
average depth down ingredient lists

Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.

High-volume listing for Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar - usage rank #5,797

Usage rank
#5,797
of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 95 others that also appear in exactly 40 products.
Typical depth in an ingredient list
26%
Mean relative depth 26% across 40 parsed labels, slot 3.9 on average. Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar tends to sit in the upper half of the list. Depth is location on the label, not a measured dose.

Ranks use Open Food Facts ingredient rows on this site’s refresh cycle. 247,206 ingredients with ≥1 product appearance enter the ranking. Prevalence and list depth are catalog facts, not toxicology.

How to use this page

Use prevalence before concern

Only 5% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar spans 17 named brands and is led by the Snacks group. Start with Black Cherries In Light Syrup; Churro Con Chocolate Crispy Oatmeal Cookies; Dark Chocolate, Dark when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 99.3/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.

17 named brands carry this ingredient

The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 19 of 33 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.

Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.

How do the sampled products compare?

Each point is one of the 16 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.

Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar

Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 16 entities by Safety score (X) and Flagged ingredients on label (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High score, still flaggedLow score, more flaggedHigh score, fewer flaggedLow score, fewer flagged 99.9100.0100.0100100.0100.0100.1 00.00.00.1 Safety score Flagged ingredients on label Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar
Per-product safety score and flagged-ingredient count from the same sampled listings shown below. Bubble size = linked ingredient rows. Source: Open Food Facts labels x FDA SAFFA x CSPI Chemical Cuisine.

High-volume peers for Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar

Top-decile company for Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar: 40 listings averaging 99.3/100.

Similar mean product score

Mean product-score neighbours (≥50 scored products), kept separate from the product-count peers above.

What to do with this Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar record

Start from Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar's 40 catalogued appearances and the attached source fields, then open the product rows that match your use case.

  • Review the sampled product records that list Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar to see how the ingredient appears in actual labels. Open product sample
  • Move to a second ingredient page and compare registry fields plus catalog mass side by side. Browse ingredient records
  • Check the methodology for how FDA SAFFA, CSPI, and Open Food Facts rows are joined on this site. Read the methodology

This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.

Questions readers ask about Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar

Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar?

This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#5,797 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.

Which product shelves show up most often with Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar?

Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar ranks in the top decile by product count (#5,797 of 247,206), appearing in 40 indexed products led by Snacks. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.

Why is Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar so common on ingredient lists?

The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar appears in 40 products (#5,797 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.

Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Non-gmo Pure Cane Sugar). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.