Alaska Pollock Fillets
Alaska Pollock Fillets appears in 7 indexed US food products. No FDA SAFFA status or CSPI rating is attached in this snapshot, so this page reports prevalence rather than a safety verdict.
What the data can answer
Alaska Pollock Fillets appears in 7 catalogued products, but this snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to it. This page therefore cannot answer whether the ingredient is safe from those sources. It can show how often it occurs, where it tends to sit on labels, and which kinds of products contain it.
- 7
- catalogued products
- #19,546
- usage rank of 247,206
- 3
- named brands represented
- 0%
- average depth down ingredient lists
Catalog prevalence comes from Open Food Facts ingredient lists. FDA SAFFA and CSPI Chemical Cuisine labels are shown only when the source record contains them.
Alaska Pollock Fillets: top-decile catalog footprint (#19,546 of 247,206)
- Usage rank
- #19,546
- of 247,206 ingredients that appear in at least one catalogued product, tied with 2,185 others that also appear in exactly 7 products.
- Typical depth in an ingredient list
- 0%
- Of the way down the captured list, averaged across the 7 products listing it (mean slot 1.0). Alaska Pollock Fillets usually falls near the top of the captured list; this position does not measure its amount because source formatting, compound ingredients and labeling exceptions vary.
Computed from parsed product ingredient lists (Open Food Facts). The ranking covers 247,206 ingredients that appear at least once. Neither usage rank nor label depth is a safety clearance.
What this page can and cannot answer
Use prevalence before concern
Only 14.3% of linked products carry any separately flagged ingredient. The stronger differentiator here is market placement: Alaska Pollock Fillets spans 3 named brands and is led by the Undefined group. Start with Air fried fish fillets; Beer Battered Fish Tenders; Beer Battered Wild Caught Alaskan Pollock when comparing real formulations. Because the flagged component may be something else, neither the low co-occurrence rate nor the 99.3/100 product average proves this ingredient safe.
3 named brands carry this ingredient
The processing evidence is heterogeneous rather than a single shelf pattern: the largest NOVA group contains 7 of 7 classified products, leaving a meaningful remainder elsewhere. This breadth is why the page reports label depth, category, and product examples separately. Those dimensions help locate comparable products; combining them into a stronger safety claim would hide the variation the catalog actually contains.
Next check: compare label position across two brands before treating prevalence as equivalent exposure.
How do the sampled products compare?
Each point is one of the 7 sampled products listed below: its overall safety score against how many separately flagged ingredients its label carries. Bubble size is the number of ingredient rows the label actually resolved to.
Safety score vs. flagged-ingredient count for products containing Alaska Pollock Fillets
Products Containing Alaska Pollock Fillets
High-volume slice (7 of 7) for products naming Alaska Pollock Fillets:
High-volume peers for Alaska Pollock Fillets
Top-decile company for Alaska Pollock Fillets: 7 listings averaging 99.3/100.
Similar mean product score
Mean product-score neighbours (≥50 scored products), kept separate from the product-count peers above.
Using the Alaska Pollock Fillets evidence
Start from Alaska Pollock Fillets's 7 catalogued appearances and the attached source fields, then open the product rows that match your use case.
- Open the product sample for Alaska Pollock Fillets and read how the term sits on real packages. Open product sample
- Browse another ingredient record and keep the same FDA/CSPI and prevalence fields in view. Compare a peer
- Check the methodology for how FDA SAFFA, CSPI, and Open Food Facts rows are joined on this site. Open methodology
This page describes published source classifications and product-label coverage. It is not dietary, allergy, or medical advice.
Alaska Pollock Fillets — common follow-ups
Why is there no FDA/CSPI verdict on Alaska Pollock Fillets? ▼
This snapshot has no FDA SAFFA status or CSPI Chemical Cuisine rating attached to Alaska Pollock Fillets, so PlainFoodSafe does not present a source-backed safety verdict. The page reports catalog prevalence (#19,546 of 247,206 ingredients) and label position instead.
Which product shelves show up most often with Alaska Pollock Fillets? ▼
Alaska Pollock Fillets ranks in the top decile by product count (#19,546 of 247,206), appearing in 7 indexed products led by Undefined. The sample list below is a slice of that footprint, not the full universe.
Why is Alaska Pollock Fillets so common on ingredient lists? ▼
The source record does not name a technical effect, yet Alaska Pollock Fillets appears in 7 products (#19,546 usage rank). High prevalence here describes formulation frequency, not an approved use level.
Regulatory status: FDA SAFFA (Alaska Pollock Fillets). Safety ratings: CSPI Chemical Cuisine; product presence: Open Food Facts via PlainFoodSafe (September 2026). Figures are computed from those sources, no editor-typed counts. Methodology · State regulations.